Todays World News (@TodaysWorldNews) / Twitter

Showing posts with label Federal government of the United States. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Federal government of the United States. Show all posts

Monday, May 16, 2011

US government hits debt ceiling, lighting 11-week fuse - Politics Wires - MiamiHerald.com

The western front of the United States Capitol...Image via Wikipediahttp://www.miamiherald.com/2011/05/16/2219825/us-government-hits-debt-ceiling.html
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner informed Congress on Monday that the United States has reached its legal debt limit, setting off a ticking time bomb that could explode in less than three months if lawmakers can't bridge differences and allow more government borrowing.
In hitting the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling - the limit on how much the government can borrow - the Obama administration on Monday began temporarily halting payments to the retirement and federal pension accounts of federal workers and started borrowing from those funds, to be restored later.
Geithner sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., warning that the government can move money around for about 11 weeks but if a new debt ceiling isn't agreed to by Aug. 2, the U.S. government could effectively default on its obligations to its creditors. He warned of "catastrophic economic consequences for citizens" unless Congress raises the debt ceiling.
An increase of about $2 trillion is expected, enough to get the issue past the 2012 elections before Congress would have to lift it again.
Republicans who control the House of Representatives vow to link raising the debt ceiling to cuts in government spending of at least equal measure. In a combative statement Monday, House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, upped the ante.
"As I have said numerous times, there will be no debt limit increase without serious budget reforms and significant spending cuts, cuts that are greater than any increase in the debt limit." Boehner has called previously for $2 trillion in spending cuts as part of any deal to raise the debt ceiling.

Wisconsin Republican U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan, the chairman of the House Budget Committee, repeated the linkage in a speech Monday in Obama's adopted hometown.
"For every dollar the president wants to raise the debt ceiling, we can show him plenty of ways to cut far more than a dollar of spending," Ryan told the Economic Club of Chicago. "Given the magnitude of our debt burden, the size of the spending cuts should exceed the size of the president's debt limit increase."

Republicans rule out tax increases and any significant cuts in defense spending. The United States continues to fight wars in Iraq and Afghanistan paid for with borrowing, the only time in U.S. history that wars weren't offset at least partially with some sort of tax.
Democrats insist that Social Security is off the table, as is an end to Medicare, but they are open to changes in Medicare funding.
If Congress fails to raise the debt ceiling by Aug. 2, it would force the Obama administration to choose between paying creditors or paying for military operations, Social Security and Medicare payments, and other commitments.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, December 12, 2010

The first global cyber war has begun, claim hackers

Get ready folks. This is not just a warning but also shows us this will be the very reason they decide to take away a very own internet among the Freedom of Speech we all have today.
Whether or not you've been keeping up with this. Now would be a good time.
If these hackers do exist, I would like to say one thing. Thanks for messing up our only choice of Freedom of speech that we have left.
On the other hand I seem to feel like this is the very warped frame of Politics to make us believe that the internet would be better controlled by Government.
Either way we look at it. Get ready. Here is the number 1 reason they will tell us that we can no longer use the Net on our own terms. Time for more people to be controlled and what we will be able to access on the internet.  Be sure to click the link for the full story here.
You'll see right away what I'm talking about.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/11/wikileaks-backlash-cyber-war
Julian Assange
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. Photograph: Lennart Preiss/AP

He is one of the newest recruits to Operation Payback. In a London bedroom, the 24-year-old computer hacker is preparing his weaponry for this week's battles in an evolving cyberwar. He is a self-styled defender of free speech, his weapon a laptop and his enemy the US corporations responsible for attacking the website WikiLeaks.
He had seen the flyers that began springing up on the web in mid-September. In chatrooms, on discussion boards and inboxes from Manchester to New York to Sydney the grinning face of a Guy Fawkes mask had appeared with a call to arms. Across the world a battalion of hackers was being summoned.
"Greetings, fellow anons," it said beneath the headline Operation Payback. Alongside were a series of software programs dubbed "our weapons of choice" and a stark message: people needed to show their "hatred".
Like most international conflicts, last week's internet war began over a relatively modest squabble, escalating in days into a global fight.
Before WikiLeaks, Operation Payback's initial target was America's recording industry, chosen for its prosecutions of music file downloaders. From those humble origins, Payback's anti-censorship, anti-copyright, freedom of speech manifesto would go viral, last week pitting an amorphous army of online hackers against the US government and some of the biggest corporations in the world.
Charles Dodd, a consultant to US government agencies on internet security, said: "[The hackers] attack from the shadows and they have no fear of retaliation. There are no rules of engagement in this kind of emerging warfare."
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, November 11, 2010

Gov. Perry: Feds Must Secure Borders, Deal With Illegals Already Here

http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/rick-perry-drug-cartels/2010/11/08/id/376387?s=al&promo_code=B120-1
By Matt Belvedere
Texas Republican Gov. Rick Perry describes the federal government’s commitment to securing the U.S. border with Mexico as “lacking and almost nonexistent." During a breakfast roundtable with reporters on Monday in Washington, D.C., he told Newsmax that he favors a two-pronged approach to immigration reform: border security first;
rick,perry,drug,cartels,mexico,border
then dealing with the millions of illegal immigrants who are already in the United States.
Perry was in the nation’s capital to promote his new book, "Fed Up! Our Fight to Save America from Washington." With a foreword written by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, the book makes the case for returning power to the states and to the American people through a constitutionally limited federal government.
The Constitution clearly does give some responsibilities to the federal government, Perry told Newsmax, adding: “Securing our borders is something they [the federal government] must do . . . Americans want to see that border secured and drug cartels pushed off that border.
“Then we can have a conversation about how we reform the immigration policies . . . I don't think the American people trust Congress to do them."
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

U.S. Helps Radical Muslim Groups Get Taxpayer Dollars | Judicial Watch

Altaf HusainImage by umar nasir via FlickrIn case you don't know much about what is going on in not just the White House, but the entire Administration today. You may want to step back and start paying more attention.  As a Nation that is already broke and our Children's Children just may be marked as slaves, We have money going to places that just don't  make any sense. For a person claiming to Christian at the time is paying of Islam? Check out the link below and also the links within. It's not a joke. This is a serious matter.
People in America need to remember. WE DO NOT WORK FOR THE GOVERNMENT! The Constitution clearly states that THE GOVERNMENT WORKS FOR WE THE PEOPLE.


This below is seriously uncalled for.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2010/aug/u-s-helps-radical-muslim-groups-get-taxpayer-dollars
In its fervent crusade to befriend Muslims, the White House will host special workshops this week to provide members of radical Islamic groups with direct access to U.S. government funding, assistance and resources.
While this may sound surreal, it’s reality in the Obama Administration, which has embarked on a never-ending mission to befriend the enemy. Previous efforts include secret meetings between Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and extremist Arab and Muslim groups to discuss national security matters and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s special order allowing the reentry of two radical Islamic academics whose terrorist ties have for years banned them from the U.S.
As contemptible as those moves may seem, the latest effort is even more outrageous. Various government agencies, including the departments of Homeland Security, Agriculture, Education and Health will participate in the White House seminars which were exposed by an independent nonprofit dedicated to monitoring the nation’s security.
While the U.S. government has kept the event quiet, it was announced in a newsletter by a Saudi-funded group (Islamic Society of North America or ISNA) that was a co-conspirator in a federal terrorist funding case a few years ago. Featured in a Judicial Watch special report on Muslim charities that finance terrorism, ISNA is firmly committed to spreading the radical form of Islam, which is the driving force behind Jihad.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

GOPUSA » Commentary » Malkin: Arizona vs. the U.N. Human Rights Police

Philadelphia - Old City: Second Bank of the Un...Image by wallyg via FlickrMy God what is going on in the White House that makes them think they defy the United States and the Constitution?
Are they actually trying to create a War? This has got the be the stupidest thing I have ever seen from any United States Government. This is going to a foreign country to deal with a state in the US.
Where is that in the Constitution? This is what causes Kings and Queens to be overthrown.







http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/2010/09/arizona-vs-the-un-human-rights-police.php
An indignant President Obama complained last week, "I can't spend all of my time with my birth certificate plastered on my forehead." Fine. How about plastering a copy of his presidential oath of office there instead? The kowtowing commander-in-chief is in dire need of a daily reminder that his job is to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States" -- not international law or global diktats.
Case in point: Last week, Obama's State Department handed in America's first-ever report to the United Nations Commissioner for Human Rights in conjunction with something called the "Universal Periodic Review." In short, the 29-page document is a self-aggrandizing report card touting the administration's far-left domestic and foreign policy initiatives for the world's approval. The report boasts of racial- and gender-bean-counting in the executive branch; Justice Department outreach to Muslim grievance groups opposed to post-9/11 security measures; teachers' union payoffs in the federal stimulus law; continuing commitment to closing the Gitmo detention facility for enemy combatants; and the illusory lifesaving effects of Obamacare on minorities through "expanding community health centers" (which have yet to be built, but not that it matters in our Nobel Peace Prize-winning president's age of post-achievement).
The report also includes a section on "values and immigration," which essentially singles out Arizona's immigration enforcement law as a human rights deficiency "that is being addressed in a court action."
In response, Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer rightly blasted Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration for succumbing to "internationalism run amok." Brewer pointed out in a letter to Clinton, "Human rights as guaranteed by the United States and Arizona Constitutions are expressly protected in S.B. 1070 and defended vigorously by my Administration. In fact, the Department of Justice has correctly not included these so-called 'human rights' issues in the current litigation against the State of Arizona." Somehow, that inconvenient detail escaped the Foggy Bottom bureaucrats' notice.
Read more: http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/2010/09/arizona-vs-the-un-human-rights-police.php#ixzz0yLHAxBDW
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

U.S. Funding of the United Nations Reaches All-Time High » Spotlight on Sovereignty » Global Governance Watch

The western front of the United States Capitol...Image via Wikipediahttp://www.globalgovernancewatch.org/spotlight_on_sovereignty/us-funding-of-the-united-nations-reaches-alltime-high

The source and amounts of all U.S. funding to the myriad number of organizations affiliated with the United Nations are difficult to track accurately. This difficulty prompted Congress to pass legislation requiring the Administration to report annually on U.S. contributions to the U.N. A recent report to Congress by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on all U.S. funding to the U.N. system revealed that U.S. contributions to the U.N. system reached record levels in fiscal year (FY) 2009.[1]
Considering budget trends, U.S. contributions will continue to rise. Having an accurateaccount of U.S. contributions to the U.N. is valuable, particularly considering recent revelations about institutional weaknesses in U.N. oversight. Congress should take action to make the current OMB reporting requirement permanent.

U.S. Funding of the U.N. System

The U.S. has been the largest financial supporter of the U.N. since the organization's founding in 1945. The U.S. is currently assessed 22 percent of the U.N. regular budget and more than 27 percent of the U.N. peacekeeping budget. In dollar terms, the Administration's budget for FY 2011 requested $516.3 million for the U.N. regular budget and more than $2.182 billion for the peacekeeping budget. [2]
However, the U.S. also provides assessed financial contributions to other U.N.organizations and voluntary contributions to many more U.N. organizations. According to OMB, total U.S. contributions to the U.N. system were more than $6.347 billion in FY2009.[3] This is more than $1 billion more than total contributions as compiled by OMB for FY 2005,[4] and it is indicative of the rising budgetary trends in the U.N. and the consequential demand on U.S. financial support.

The reporting requirement was instigated by the expansion of the U.N. system. The creation of new U.N.-affiliated bodies over the years that received independent financial support from the U.S. government made it increasingly difficult to calculate how much the U.S. provided to the U.N. system on an annual basis. Past estimates were based on contributions from the State Department to the U.N. system, but this was not comprehensive. Although the State Department is the largest source of U.S. funding to the U.N. system, it is not the sole source.
Be sure to see all the links provided on the pages link above as well.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, July 31, 2010

Should Immigration Reform Include a National ID?

RFID cards and readerImage by sridgway via Flickr

Should Immigration Reform Include a National ID? 




  • read more on www.cato.org
    Watch the Event in QuickTime (M4V)
    Download a Podcast of the Event (MP3) The emerging Senate comprehensive immigration reform is said to include a temporary worker program, a "tough but fair" path to legalization, and enhanced border security. These elements, if well designed, would effectively solve the immigration challenge: enhancing homeland security, reducing the number of unlawful residents, and providing for our economic needs. But should reform also require American workers to have a biometric national ID? What are the implementation issues, how expensive would it be, and would huge government databases of personal information put law-abiding citizens' privacy, identity security, and freedom at risk? Would mission creep ultimately give the federal government unprecedented power over Americans' lives? Please join Cato's Jim Harper and the ACLU's Chris Calabrese for a discussion of the costs and consequences of including a biometric national ID proposal in immigration reform legislation.
    We are at capacity for this event and are unable to accept additional reservations. An archived video will be available on this webpage following the event. Thank you for your interest in our public programs.




  • Is a biometric, national ID card an immigration game changer?




  • The Democrats' immigration-reform proposal (pdf) is 26 pages long. Pages 8 through 18 are devoted to "ending illegal employment through biometric employment verification." I don't think the Democrats are going to like me calling this a biometric national ID card, as they go to great lengths to say that it is not a national ID card, and make it "unlawful for any person, corporation; organization local, state, or federal law enforcement officer; local or state government; or any other entity to require or even ask an individual cardholder to produce their social security card for any purpose other than electronic verification of employment eligibility and verification of identity for Social Security Administration purposes."
    But it's still a biometric national ID card. It's handed out by the Social Security Administration and employers are required to check it when hiring new employees. Essentially, if you want to participate in the American economy, you need this card. "Within five (5) years of the date of enactment, the fraud-proof social security card will serve as the sole acceptable document to be produced by an employee to an employer for employment verification purposes," the bill says. "This requirement will exist even if the employer does not yet possess the capability to electronically verify the employee by scanning the card through a card reader."







  • Posted by Jim Harper
    So reports the Wall Street Journal:
    Lawmakers working to craft a new comprehensive immigration bill have settled on a way to prevent employers from hiring illegal immigrants: a national biometric identification card all American workers would eventually be required to obtain.
    It’s the natural evolution of the policy called “internal enforcement” of immigration law, as I wrote in my paper, “Franz Kafka’s Solution to Illegal Immigration.”
    Once in place, watch for this national ID to regulate access to financial services, housing, medical care and prescriptions—and, of course, serve as an internal passport.






  • read more on www.irishcentral.com
    Posted on Tuesday, March 09, 2010 at 02:25 PM

    New immigration reform bill will have national identity card




  • read more on www.irishcentral.com



  • read more on www.irishcentral.com

    A national identity card for employers to check is at the heart of the new immigration reform legislation being proposed by Senator Chuck Schumer, a Democrat from New York and Senator Lindsay Graham, a Republican from South Carolina.

    All legal U.S. workers would be issued with the ID card which would have a biometric identification impossible to duplicate.

    Schumer and Graham were due to meet President Obama this week to discuss their immigration reform plan which would also allow those here illegally to stay and gain a path to citizenship. However, Graham's plane flight from South Carolina was canceled and the meeting was postponed.

    Schumer says the national identity card is the key to getting a bill passed "It's the nub of solving the immigration dilemma politically speaking," Schumer said in an interview in the Wall Street Journal . The card, he said, would make it impossible for any new illegals to find work. "If you say they can't get a job when they come here, you'll stop it." he stated.would become de facto national ID cards that enable the government to track citizens.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, July 30, 2010

Scientists: BP dispersants have made spill more toxic

Here is what I don't understand. Why is it the NBC is so late on this subject? Most of us that are here on Todays World New Blog have been talking about this for Months now. Not even weeks, but Months. How is is even possible for the Main Stream Media be so late on reporting all this?
clipped from www.msnbc.msn.com

Editor's note: Lisa Myers' report on oil dispersants will air Friday on
NBC Nightly News.
Amid growing concern about the use of dispersants in the Gulf of Mexico, a group of scientists working for law firms suing BP says their testing indicates that the dispersants being used to break up the oil are making this spill even more toxic to marine life.
Dr. William Sawyer, a toxicologist, is part of a team of scientists hired by law firms — led by Smith Stag of New Orleans — that are representing Louisiana fishermen and environmentalists.
The scientists collected and analyzed globs of oil, sand, and water from more than a dozen sites in four states along the Gulf.
Sawyer told NBC News that the findings are troubling. "We now have compelling evidence that the dispersant has enhanced and increased the toxicity from the spill," he said.
Spreading the damage?

So far, the federal government has approved use of more than 1.8 million gallons of dispersant in the Gulf. Most of it is Corexit 9500.
blog it

Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, July 15, 2010

Obama Overtakes Carter As Worst President Of The U.S. In The Last 100 Years

Official presidential portrait of Barack Obama...Image via Wikipedia

Obama Overtakes Carter As Worst President Of The U.S. In The Last 100 Years


  • read more on www.usofearth.com

  • read more on www.usofearth.com

    Polling Question: Who Do You Think Is The Worst President Of The U.S. In The Last 100 Years?

    President Carter Should Be Happy

    President Carter has long been considered the worst President of the United States in the last 100 years. No longer as Barack Obama has eclipsed him in the latest poll just out from AHF Polling.  Only by 3% but this is significant as America continues a massive decline economically as more and more stimulus bills are introduced now monthly by the Democrats and Obama. These bills can only further erode the U.S. economically month after month as the United States is effectively bankrupt.  See the U.S. Debt Clock for astonishing details of what the U.S. government has done to the United States.
    Rasmussen which is one of the best polling organizations in America today released nearly the worst results ever for the new President. See: June 16 – Daily Presidential Tracking Poll and see U.S.E. Polling Center daily for latest polls from all sources.
    Poll Conducted: June 14 – June 15, 2010
    Phone Interviews Held: 1438  (49% Female, 51% Male)
    Poll Specifics: Registered Voters In the United States (excluding Hawaii and Alaska residents).  Political breakdown of those polled was 30% Republican, 31% Democratic, 36% Independents and 3% Other/Don't Know/Refused or Avoided Answer.
    Poll Conducted By: Abrams, Herzog & Filippi Analytics
    Poll Release Date: June 17, 2010 Press Release: Obama Overtakes Carter As The Worst President Of The U.S. In the Last 100 Years

Enhanced by Zemanta

Brief for 9 states backs Arizona immigration law

Humphrey's Summit - highest point in Arizona -...Image by Al_HikesAZ via Flickr

Brief for 9 states backs Arizona immigration law


  • read more on news.yahoo.com

  • read more on news.yahoo.com
    DETROIT – States have the authority to enforce immigration laws and protect their borders, Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox said Wednesday in a legal brief on behalf of nine states supporting Arizona's immigration law.
    Cox, one of five Republicans running for Michigan governor, said Michigan is the lead state backing Arizona in federal court and is joined by Alabama, Florida, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas and Virginia, as well as the Northern Mariana Islands.
    The Arizona law, set to take effect July 29, directs officers to question people about their immigration status during the enforcement of other laws such as traffic stops and if there's a reasonable suspicion they're in the U.S. illegally.
    President Barack Obama's administration recently filed suit in federal court to block it, arguing immigration is a federal issue. The law's backers say Congress isn't doing anything meaningful about illegal immigration, so it's the state's duty to step up.
    "Arizona, Michigan and every other state have the authority to enforce immigration laws, and it is appalling to see President Obama use taxpayer dollars to stop a state's efforts to protect its own borders," Cox said in a statement.

  • read more on news.yahoo.com
    In a telephone interview, Cox said the nine states supporting Arizona represents "a lot of states," considering it was only Monday that he asked other state attorneys general to join him. The brief was filed in U.S. District Court in Arizona on the same day as the deadline for such filings.
    "By lawsuit, rather than by legislation, the federal government seeks to negate this preexisting power of the states to verify a person's immigration status and similarly seeks to reject the assistance that the states can lawfully provide to the Federal government," the brief states.
    The brief doesn't represent the first time Cox has clashed with the Obama administration. Earlier this year, he joined with more than a dozen other attorneys general to file a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of federal health care changes signed into law by the Democratic president.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, July 9, 2010

Supreme Federal Tyranny For Arizona

REALITY REPORT #52 - Supreme Federal Tyranny For Arizona




http://RealityReport.TV | http://RestoreTheRepublic.com | In this edition, Gary takes a look at the recent lawsuit the federal government has brought against Arizona regarding their immigration law and special guest Tom Woods, author of the new book "Nullification" breaks down the Supremacy Clause. Michael Boldin from the Tenth Amendment Center returns to discuss the NullifyNow.com national tour. Also, Rick Barber, Alabama Congressional Hopeful, joins Gary to talk about his inspiring and controversial campaign ad. Nina delivers the details on the Federal Government v Arizona case, recent Russian war games, biometric ATM’s, and a new surveillance system triggered by the tone of your voice. As always we'll take a dip into the Mailbag, and brand a new Enemy of the State.
blog it
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Criminal Investigation of BP Staged Oil Spill Vital to Gulf Recovery



  • read more on beforeitsnews.com
    Oil Disaster The Rig The Blew up - The Untold Story

  • read more on beforeitsnews.com
    Documentary exploring what really happened in the first 36 hours of the biggest environmental disaster in US history - the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Featuring exclusive access and footage, the film follows the salvage team called in to save the burning oil rig Deepwater Horizon, and unravels the desperate story of the men tasked with preventing a catastrophe www.youtube.com/watch?v=So--O0g2860&feature=player_embedded Click Above to view video

  • read more on beforeitsnews.com

  • read more on beforeitsnews.com
    Oil Disaster: The Rig That Blew Up was never going to win any awards for its less-than-imaginative title, and true to Five's form, this hastily cobbled together documentary about one of the planet's worst ever ecological disasters was less than brilliant.
    If you tuned in expecting an in-depth assessment of the ecological impact of the explosion of Deepwater Horizon, or a look at the subsequent political fallout and President Obama's Brit-bashing in the weeks following, you'd have been seriously disappointed.
    For this is Five, a channel which sticks Ice Road Truckers on at primetime and seems to be courting a target audience of blokes who get their kicks watching massive bits of machinery been driven around by Americans with handlebar moustaches. It takes all sorts.

  • read more on beforeitsnews.com

  • read more on oilprice.com

  • read more on oilprice.com
    Bad news concerning the Gulf oil disaster continues to come from WMR's federal government sources in the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the US Army Corps of Engineers. Emergency planners are dealing with a prospective "dead zone" within a 200 mile radius from the Deepwater Horizon disaster datum in the Gulf.
    A looming environmental and population displacement disaster is brewing in the Gulf. The oil dispersant used by BP, Corexit 9500, is seen by FEMA sources as mixing with evaporated water from the Gulf and absorbed by rain clouds producing toxic precipitation that threatens to continue killling marine and land animals, plant life, and humans within a 200-mile radius of the Deepwater Horizon disaster site in the Gulf.
    Adding to the worries of FEMA and the Corps of Engineers is the large amounts of methane that are escaping from the cavernous grotto of oil underneath the Macondo drilling area of Gulf of Mexico.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Featured Post

The Truth about the Palestinian and Israeli conflict