Soros Tied to Over 30 Major News Organizations Info Main Media don't want you to know.

Image by Getty Images via @daylifehttp://visiontoamerica.org/635/soros-tied-to-over-30-major-news-organizations
When liberal investor George Soros gave $1.8 million to National Public Radio , it became part of the firestorm of controversy that jeopardized NPR’s federal funding. But that gift only hints at the widespread influence the controversial billionaire has on the mainstream media. Soros, who spent $27 million trying to defeat President Bush in 2004, has ties to more than 30 mainstream news outlets – including The New York Times, Washington Post, the Associated Press, NBC and ABC
Prominent journalists like ABC’s Christiane Amanpour and former Washington Post editor and now Vice President Len Downie serve on boards of operations that take Soros cash. This despite the Society of Professional Journalists’ ethical code stating: “avoid all conflicts real or perceived.”
This information is part of an upcoming report by the Media Research Centers Business & Media Institute which has been looking into George Soros and his influence on the media.

Lets go back yet again to 2009. A Global Carbon TAX?

So lets get this straight

1. He wants Carbon Taxes to "fight global warming", when that will do nothing(even if you believe in obviously bogus global warming)-in fact it will increase CO2 by shifting it to China/India.

2. He wants MORE money for the banks-who arent loaning to people after the FIRST bailout.

3. He calls traditional Capitalism "Market FUNDAMENTALISM" and He wants a new world wide system, that he did NOT deny is Socialistic(NWO)

4. He wants "more pain" (economically), when we are already heading into a Depression.

The Puppeteer Behind Obama: George Soros
http://obambi.wordpress.com/2008/05/30/soros/

The Forces Behind Obama: Soros, Acorn
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/the-forces-behind-obama-soros-and-acorn

LaRouche Denounces Obama's Godfather George Soros Behind Attempt To Start World War III in the Caucasus
http://www.larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2008/lar_pac/080809soros_behind_war.html

George Soros: The United States Must Stop Resisting The Orderly Decline Of The Dollar, The Coming Global Currency And The New World Order

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/george-soros-the-united-states-must-stop-resisting-the-orderly-decline-of-the-dollar-the-coming-global-currency-and-the-new-world-order
In the video you are about to see, George Soros talks about "the creation of a New World Order", he discusses the need for a "managed decline" of the U.S. dollar and he talks at length of the global need for a true world currency. So just who is George Soros? Well, he is a billionaire "philanthropist" who came to be known as "the Man Who Broke the Bank of England" when he raked in a staggering one billion dollars during the 1992 "Black Wednesday" currency crisis. These days Soros is most famous for being perhaps the most "politically active" (at least openly) billionaire in the world. His Open Society Institute is in more than 60 countries and it spends approximately $600 million a year promoting the ideals that Soros wants promoted. Soros and his pet organizations have played a key role in quite a few "revolutions" around the globe over the last several decades, but these days the main goal of George Soros is to bring political change to the United States.
So exactly what is it that George Soros is trying to accomplish? Well, in a nutshell, what he wants is a Big Brother-style one world government based on extreme European-style socialism, strict population control and the radical green agenda. It would be a world where the state tightly regulates everything that we do for the greater benefit of the environment and of society as a whole.
However, Soros is not the "mastermind of the New World Order" that some have tried to make him out to be.  The truth is that to those in the international banking elite, Soros is considered to be something of a "black sheep" and an "outsider".  Much of what Soros is trying to accomplish lines up with the goals of the international banking elite, but what they don't like is that Soros won't stop publicly talking about a global currency and a "New World Order".  Of course the international banking elite very much want a global currency and a "New World Order", but what they don't need is a "squeaky wheel" like Soros running around drawing unneeded attention to those goals.

Related articles

• 30 "Networks" & George Soros ? (2012patriot.wordpress.com)
• How Come We Don't Hear About Soros Involved in Over 30 Major News Organizationis (rantsandrage.wordpress.com)
• Why Don't We Hear About Soros' Ties to Over 30 Major News Organizations? Asks Fox News (birdflu666.wordpress.com)
• SOROS Major News Organizations (whitelocust.wordpress.com)
• The Tentacles of George Soros! (wdednh.wordpress.com)
• Too bad about ProPublica (bokertov.typepad.com)
• SOROS Major News Organizations (atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com)
• Soros Linked to Over 30 Major News Organizations; ABCNEWS Amanpour sits on board... (foxnews.com)
• Fox News and CBS not influenced by George Soros? (jlue.wordpress.com)
• George Soros's Globalist-Leftist Elites (GLE's) Controlled Spooky Man Media...TY Glenn Beck (k2globalcommunicationsllc.wordpress.com)

Comcast, NBC deal opens door for online video

Image via CrunchBaseTo some this may not sound like a big deal. But, for those that don't know about Net Neutrality you may want to take the time to search it out and learn more about it. It's bad enough to have Government trying to regulate the internet. It's worse when major companies and Government both have their greedy hands involved in controlling the main source of Freedom we have left.
Though the outside of this article may sound nice. Check out the entire article below at the link.
The last thing we need is package deals for what sites we can visit and what we cannot.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110228/ap_on_hi_te/us_tec_comcast_nbc_online_video

By JOELLE TESSLER, AP Technology Writer Joelle Tessler, Ap Technology Writer – Mon Feb 28, 8:55 am ET

WASHINGTON – New Internet video services from companies such as Netflix and Apple are offering a glimpse of a home entertainment future that doesn't include a pricey monthly cable bill.
To challenge the cable TV industry's dominance in the living room, though, online video services need popular movies and TV shows to lure viewers, and access to high-speed Internet networks to reach them.
Yet they have had no rights to either — until now.
To win government approval to take over NBC Universal last month, cable giant Comcast Corp. agreed to let online rivals license NBC programming, including hit shows such as "30 Rock" and "The Office." Comcast also agreed not to block its 17 million broadband subscribers from watching video online through Netflix, Apple's iTunes and other rivals yet to come.
Those requirements aim to ensure that the nation's largest cable TV company, with nearly 23 million video subscribers in 39 states, cannot stifle the growth of the nascent Internet video business. Although they apply only to Comcast and NBC, these conditions could serve as a model for other big entertainment companies in dealing with new online competitors. They also send a powerful message that the government believes these promising young rivals deserve an opportunity to take on established media companies.
"These conditions are not just window dressing," said Paul Gallant, an analyst for MF Global, a financial brokerage. "They come across as a pretty comprehensive effort to give Internet TV a real shot at taking off."
The Federal Communications Commission and the Justice Department spent more than a year reviewing Comcast's plan to buy a 51 percent stake in NBC Universal from General Electric. The deal gives Comcast control over the NBC and Telemundo broadcast networks, cable channels such as CNBC and Bravo, the Universal Pictures movie studio and a stake in Hulu.com, which distributes NBC and other broadcast programming online.
Government officials wanted to ensure that Comcast could not crush competition through its control over both a major media empire and the pipes that deliver cable and Internet services to millions of American homes.
But figuring out how to protect online video was tricky because the market is still taking shape.
Netflix offers subscription plans with unlimited online viewing for $8 a month. Apple and Amazon.com let customers rent or buy individual movies and TV shows for as little as a few dollars apiece — providing an alternative for people who don't want big bundles of cable channels they may never watch. Apple and Google make set-top boxes and software that transfer online video to television sets, freeing it from computer screens. TV makers are also building in Internet capabilities.
All these options could make it easier to cut the cable cord — and the cable bill. In 2010, Comcast's cable customers paid an average of $70 per month for video services.

Related articles

• Comcast, NBC deal opens door for online video (theglobeandmail.com)
• Comcast, NBC deal opens door for online video (sfgate.com)
• Comcast, NBC deal opens door for online video (physorg.com)
• Comcast, NBC deal opens door for online video (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• TV Packages: (cbcburke9.wordpress.com)
• The Comcast-NBC Takeover Might Come With Some Interesting Conditions, Like Net Neutrality [Comcast] (gizmodo.com)
• Early Christmas for Comcast: FCC Chair Approves NBC Universal Merger (dailyfinance.com)
• "Comcast takes over NBC Universal - From the Poughkeepsie Journal" and related posts (poughkeepsiejournal.com)
• Comcast taking over of NBC Universal late Friday (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• A look at possible conditions in Comcast, NBC deal (seattletimes.nwsource.com)

Comcast wins government approval to take over NBC - The Globe and Mail

Here we go, Those of you that don't know about net neutrality. It's all about Governments control over the media powerhouses and a way for those powerhouses to charge extra for being able to see certain things on the net. I have noticed many people really don't know much about this. I suggest if you have the time to check it out.
Today we find Comcast, just one of those powerhouses bought out NBC. Not that they aren't part of that media outrage already. But, now Government, FCC and Comcast will now have full control over any Freedom of Speech spoken of on this station and outlets even more. Check out the article below.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/comcast-wins-government-approval-to-take-over-nbc/article1874624
Government regulators on Tuesday gave Comcast Corp. (CMCSA-Q23.030.251.10%), the country's largest cable company, clearance to take over NBC Universal in a deal that is certain to transform the entertainment industry landscape.
Comcast is buying a 51 per cent stake in NBC Universal, home of the NBC television network, from General Electric Co. (GE-N18.27-0.33-1.77%) for $13.8-billion (U.S.) in cash and assets.

More related to this story

• FCC seeks conditions on Comcast, NBC deal

The Justice Department and five state attorneys general said Tuesday that they have reached a court settlement allowing the companies to proceed with their combination, subject to conditions intended to preserve competition among TV providers.
In addition, the five-member Federal Communications Commission on Tuesday voted 4-1 to approve the transaction, subject to similar but broader conditions.
Among other things, regulators are requiring Comcast to make NBC programming available to competitors such as satellite companies, as well as new Internet video services that could pose a threat to the company's core cable business.
Government officials want to ensure that online video services from companies such as Netflix Inc., Amazon.com Inc. and Apple Inc. can get the movies and TV shows they need to grow — and potentially offer a cheaper alternative to monthly cable subscriptions. Still, the conditions did not go far enough for Michael Copps, one of the three Democrats on the FCC and a vocal critic of media consolidation. Copps voted against the deal, warning that it “confers too much power in one company's hands.”

Related articles

• FAQ: What the Comcast/NBC deal means to you (news.cnet.com)
• Comcast wins FCC approval to take over NBC (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• Comcast-NBC merger approved (dailykos.com)
• Comcast wins FCC approval to take over NBC (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• Comcast gets FCC approval to take over NBC Universal (pennlive.com)
• Comcast wins government approval to take over NBC (sfgate.com)
• Comcast-NBC Deal Approved by FCC (blippitt.com)
• Comcast NBC Universal Merger Approved By FCC Today [Video] (realestateradiousa.com)
• Comcast wins FCC approval to take over NBC (chron.com)

Scientists: BP dispersants have made spill more toxic

Here is what I don't understand. Why is it the NBC is so late on this subject? Most of us that are here on Todays World New Blog have been talking about this for Months now. Not even weeks, but Months. How is is even possible for the Main Stream Media be so late on reporting all this?

clipped from www.msnbc.msn.com Editor's note: Lisa Myers' report on oil dispersants will air Friday on NBC Nightly News. Amid growing concern about the use of dispersants in the Gulf of Mexico, a group of scientists working for law firms suing BP says their testing indicates that the dispersants being used to break up the oil are making this spill even more toxic to marine life. Dr. William Sawyer, a toxicologist, is part of a team of scientists hired by law firms — led by Smith Stag of New Orleans — that are representing Louisiana fishermen and environmentalists. The scientists collected and analyzed globs of oil, sand, and water from more than a dozen sites in four states along the Gulf. Sawyer told NBC News that the findings are troubling. "We now have compelling evidence that the dispersant has enhanced and increased the toxicity from the spill," he said. Spreading the damage? So far, the federal government has approved use of more than 1.8 million gallons of dispersant in the Gulf. Most of it is Corexit 9500. Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Related articles by Zemanta

• Scientists: BP dispersants making spill more toxic (msnbc.msn.com)
• Scientists Find Evidence That Oil And Dispersant Mix Is Making Its Way Into The Foodchain (huffingtonpost.com)
• Reports of BP disaster's death are greatly exaggerated (grist.org)
• Is the dispersant used in oil spills just as bad as the oil itself? (greenanswers.com)
• EPA Whistleblower Hugh Kaufman: We've Now Poisoned Thousands of Square Miles of the Gulf (videocafe.crooksandliars.com)
• Oil Spill: Have You Filed a Claim With BP? Share Your Experience! (huffingtonpost.com)
• Breaking: BP Spill is Over, Oil is Gone, Problem Solved (treehugger.com)
• Gulf oil dispersants unlikely to be endocrine disruptors and have relatively low cell toxicity, tests find (sciencedaily.com)
• Gulf oil dispersants unlikely to be endocrine disruptors and have relatively low cell toxicity (physorg.com)
• Has the Oil Damage Been Exaggerated? A Response (ecocentric.blogs.time.com)

Essay:John Wall divorce agreement - Conservapedia

• Essay:John Wall divorce agreement - Conservapedia

  "Divorce agreement “ Dear American liberals, leftists, social progressives, socialists, Marxists and Obama supporters, et al: We have stuck together since the late 1950's, but the whole of this latest election process has made me realize that I want a divorce. I know we tolerated each other for many years for the sake of future generations, but sadly, this relationship has run its course. Our two ideological sides of America cannot and will not ever agree on what is right so let's just end it on friendly terms. We can smile and chalk it up to irreconcilable differences and go our own way. Here is a model separation agreement: Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass each taking a portion. That will be the difficult part, but I am sure our two sides can come to a friendly agreement. After that, it should be relatively easy! Our respective representatives can effortlessly divide other assets since both sides have such distinct and disparate tastes. We don't like redistributive taxes so you can keep them. You are welcome to the liberal judges and the ACLU. Since you hate guns and war, we'll take our firearms, the cops, the NRA and the military. You can keep Oprah, Michael Moore and Rosie O'Donnell (You are, however, responsible for finding a bio-diesel vehicle big enough to move all three of them). We'll keep the capitalism, greedy corporations, pharmaceutical companies, Wal-Mart and Wall Street. You can have your beloved homeless, homeboys, hippies and illegal aliens. We'll keep the hot Alaskan hockey moms, greedy CEO's and rednecks. We'll keep the Bibles and give you NBC and Hollywood. You can make nice with Iran and Palestine and we'll retain the right to invade and hammer places that threaten us. You can have the peaceniks and war protesters. When our allies or our way of life are under assault, we'll help provide them security. We'll keep our Judeo-Christian values. You are welcome to Islam, Scientology, Humanism and Shirley McClain. You can also have the U.N.. but we will no l

  tags: essay, john, wall, Divorce, agreement, Right, Left, America

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.