U.S. Funding of the United Nations Reaches All-Time High » Spotlight on Sovereignty » Global Governance Watch

Image via Wikipediahttp://www.globalgovernancewatch.org/spotlight_on_sovereignty/us-funding-of-the-united-nations-reaches-alltime-high

The source and amounts of all U.S. funding to the myriad number of organizations affiliated with the United Nations are difficult to track accurately. This difficulty prompted Congress to pass legislation requiring the Administration to report annually on U.S. contributions to the U.N. A recent report to Congress by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on all U.S. funding to the U.N. system revealed that U.S. contributions to the U.N. system reached record levels in fiscal year (FY) 2009.[1]
Considering budget trends, U.S. contributions will continue to rise. Having an accurateaccount of U.S. contributions to the U.N. is valuable, particularly considering recent revelations about institutional weaknesses in U.N. oversight. Congress should take action to make the current OMB reporting requirement permanent.

U.S. Funding of the U.N. System

The U.S. has been the largest financial supporter of the U.N. since the organization's founding in 1945. The U.S. is currently assessed 22 percent of the U.N. regular budget and more than 27 percent of the U.N. peacekeeping budget. In dollar terms, the Administration's budget for FY 2011 requested $516.3 million for the U.N. regular budget and more than $2.182 billion for the peacekeeping budget. [2]
However, the U.S. also provides assessed financial contributions to other U.N.organizations and voluntary contributions to many more U.N. organizations. According to OMB, total U.S. contributions to the U.N. system were more than $6.347 billion in FY2009.[3] This is more than $1 billion more than total contributions as compiled by OMB for FY 2005,[4] and it is indicative of the rising budgetary trends in the U.N. and the consequential demand on U.S. financial support.

The reporting requirement was instigated by the expansion of the U.N. system. The creation of new U.N.-affiliated bodies over the years that received independent financial support from the U.S. government made it increasingly difficult to calculate how much the U.S. provided to the U.N. system on an annual basis. Past estimates were based on contributions from the State Department to the U.N. system, but this was not comprehensive. Although the State Department is the largest source of U.S. funding to the U.N. system, it is not the sole source.
Be sure to see all the links provided on the pages link above as well.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Boehner, OMB Trade Jabs over Regulation (blogs.wsj.com)
• Obama nominates Lew to run OMB (jta.org)
• OMB To Meet With Agencies To Discuss Financial Systems (techdailydose.nationaljournal.com)
• Three Indian U.N. peacekeepers killed in Congo attack (reuters.com)
• New Law Requires OMB To Post Information On Contractors (techdailydose.nationaljournal.com)
• Ami Horowitz: Nailing a Memo to the U.N.'s Door (huffingtonpost.com)
• U.N.'s Ban to urge giving to Pakistan flood appeal (reuters.com)
• UN says still trying to get peacekeeping right (dailycaller.com)

Thousands From Terror-Sponsoring Nations Entering U.S. on 'Diversity Visas'

Image by sleepymyf via Flickr

• Thousands From Terror-Sponsoring Nations Entering U.S. on 'Diversity Visas'

  "The State Department is planning to welcome thousands of immigrants from terror-watch list countries into the United States this year through a "diversity visa" lottery -- a giant legal loophole some lawmakers say is a "serious national security threat" that has gone unchecked for years. Ostensibly designed to increase ethnic diversity among immigrants, the program invites in thousands of poorly educated laborers with few job skills -- and that's only the beginning of its problems, according to lawmakers and government investigations. "There are a lot of holes in this program in terms of security and in terms of fraud," said Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., who has written legislation aimed at killing the lottery. Now, in the wake of the botched Christmas Day terror attack that emerged from Nigeria and Yemen, members of Congress are worried the system could be vulnerable to radicals looking to "play" the visa lottery as a means of reaching the U.S. Here's how it works: to avoid getting stuck with 3.5 million others on a visa waiting list, hundreds of thousands of people put their names into the separate diversity lottery, which rewards countries that typically see low levels of immigration to the U.S. Immediate family are allowed to join lottery winners. Countries like China, where lots of immigrants originate, are excluded. Then a computer in Kentucky picks names at random from the qualified applicants, who need only a high school degree or two years at a job that requires two years of experience. The program accounts for about 10 percent of all immigrant visas each year. Included in the lottery are all four countries the U.S considers state sponsors of terror -- Iran, Sudan, Cuba, and Syria -- and 13 of the 14 nations that are coming under special monitoring from the Transportation Security Administration as founts of terrorism. Pakistan is excluded because, like China, it sends over tens of thousands of immigrants each year and doesn't need to be in the lottery. Among the winners for 2010 are: Nigeria: 6,0

  tags: visas', Government, US, Law, Freedom, Card, Credit, Passports, RFID

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Source: Visa will be noted in suspects' info (cnn.com)
• Timeline of Terror: Clues in Alleged Bomber Abdulmutallab's Past (abcnews.go.com)
• Security Lapses Are Being Addressed, Officials Tell Panel (nytimes.com)