Todays World News (@TodaysWorldNews) / Twitter

Showing posts with label United States Congress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United States Congress. Show all posts

Friday, August 19, 2011

Amnesty is here and jackpot justice

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 28:  (L-R) Homeland Secu...Image by Getty Images via @daylifehttp://www.teapartynation.com/forum/topic/show?id=3355873%3ATopic%3A1294839&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_topic
The Obama regime is thumbing its nose at Congress and creating a defacto amnesty, much like the DREAM Act, which Congress rejected.
 From Fox News:
 The Obama administration announced Thursday that it would launch a case-by-case review of illegal immigrants slated for deportation, in a move that could grant a reprieve to so-called DREAM Act beneficiaries and thousands of others. 
The DREAM Act is a proposal in Congress to give illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children a chance at legal status if they complete two years of college or military service. Though the bill has not passed, supporters and critics alike suggested Thursday's announcement could serve to unilaterally carry out its provisions.
 A spokeswoman with the Federation for American Immigration Reform described the new policy as "blanket amnesty." 
 Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/08/18/obama-administration-to-...
 According to the Washington Times, Justice will begin looking at cases on a case by case basis.  In other words, they are looking for reasons to legalize illegals.
 From the Washington Times:
 The Homeland Security Department said Thursday it will halt deportation proceedings on a case-by-case basis against illegal immigrants who meet certain criteria such as attending school, having family in the military or are primarily responsible for other family members’ care.
The move, announced in letters to Congress, won immediate praise from Hispanic activists and Democrats who had chided President Obama for months for the pace of deportations and had argued he had authority to exempt broad swaths of illegal immigrants from deportation.
“Today’s announcement shows that this president is willing to put muscle behind his words and to use his power to intervene when the lives of good people are being ruined by bad laws,” said Rep. Luis V. Gutierrez, Illinois Democrat.
In the letters to Congress, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said her department and the Justice Department will review all ongoing cases and see who meets the new criteria on a case-by-case basis.
“This case-by-case approach will enhance public safety,” she said. “Immigration judges will be able to more swiftly adjudicate high priority cases, such as those involving convicted felons.”
The new rules apply to those who have been apprehended and are in deportation proceedings, but have not been officially ordered out of the country by a judge. Miss Napolitano said a working group will try to come up with “guidance on how to provide for appropriate discretionary consideration” for “compelling cases” in those instances where someone has already been ordered deported.
It was unclear how many people might be affected by the new rules, though in fiscal year 2010 the government deported nearly 200,000 illegal immigrants who it said did not have criminal records.
 The full story is here: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/aug/18/new-dhs-rules-cance...
 This is the first move by a desperate Obama regime.  They see the poll numbers and unless they do something, they know Obama will not see a second term.  Amnesty they believe will deliver the Hispanic vote.  Given the history in the Democratic Party of election fraud, do not be surprised if some of these illegals who receive amnesty suddenly vote in next year’s election, whether they are eligible to or not.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Ron Paul Floor Speech May 25 2011

Robert R. LivingstonImage via Wikipediahttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-olNr4UuVqY&feature=player_embedded#at=121
The Last Nail The last nail is being driven into the coffin of the American Republic. Yet, Congress remains in total denial as our liberties are rapidly fading before our eyes. The process is propelled by unwarranted fear and ignorance as to the true meaning of liberty. It is driven by economic myths, fallacies and irrational good intentions. The rule of law is constantly rejected and authoritarian answers are offered as panaceas for all our problems. Runaway welfarism is used to benefit the rich at the expense of the middle class. Who would have ever thought that the current generation and Congress would stand idly by and watch such a rapid disintegration of the American Republic? Characteristic of this epic event is the casual acceptance by the people and political leaders of the unitary presidency, which is equivalent to granting dictatorial powers to the President. Our Presidents can now, on their own:


1. Order assassinations, including American citizens,
2. Operate secret military tribunals,
3. Engage in torture,
4. Enforce indefinite imprisonment without due process,
5. Order searches and seizures without proper warrants, gutting the 4th Amendment,
6. Ignore the 60 day rule for reporting to the Congress the nature of any military operations as required by the War Power Resolution,
7. Continue the Patriot Act abuses without oversight,
8. Wage war at will,
9. Treat all Americans as suspected terrorists at airports with TSA groping and nude x-raying.
And the Federal Reserve accommodates by counterfeiting the funds needed and not paid for by taxation and borrowing, permitting runaway spending, endless debt, and special interest bail-outs.
And all of this is not enough. The abuses and usurpations of the war power are soon to be codified in the National Defense Authorization Act now rapidly moving its way through the Congress. Instead of repealing the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF), as we should, now that bin Laden is dead and gone, Congress is planning to massively increase the war power of the President. Though an opportunity presents itself to end the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, Congress, with bipartisan support, obsesses on how to expand the unconstitutional war power the President already holds. The current proposal would allow a President to pursue war any time, any place, for any reason, without Congressional approval. Many believe this would even permit military activity against American suspects here at home. The proposed authority does not reference the 9/11 attacks. It would be expanded to include the Taliban and "associated" forces—a dangerously vague and expansive definition of our potential enemies. There is no denial that the changes in s.1034 totally eliminate the hard-fought-for restraint on Presidential authority to go to war without Congressional approval achieved at the Constitutional Convention. Congress' war authority has been severely undermined since World War II beginning with the advent of the Korean War which was fought solely under a UN Resolution. Even today, we're waging war in Libya without even consulting with the Congress, similar to how we went to war in Bosnia in the 1990s under President Clinton. The three major reasons for our Constitutional Convention were to:
1. Guarantee free trade and travel among the states.
2. Make gold and silver legal tender and abolish paper money.
3. Strictly limit the Executive Branch's authority to pursue war without Congressional approval.
But today:
1. Federal Reserve notes are legal tender, gold and silver are illegal.
2. The Interstate Commerce Clause is used to regulate all commerce at the expense of free trade among the states.
3. And now the final nail is placed in the coffin of Congressional responsibility for the war power, delivering this power completely to the President—a sharp and huge blow to the concept of our Republic.
In my view, it appears that the fate of the American Republic is now sealed—unless these recent trends are quickly reversed.
The saddest part of this tragedy is that all these horrible changes are being done in the name of patriotism and protecting freedom. They are justified by good intentions while believing the sacrifice of liberty is required for our safety. Nothing could be further from the truth.
More sadly is the conviction that our enemies are driven to attack us for our freedoms and prosperity, and not because of our deeply flawed foreign policy that has generated justifiable grievances and has inspired the radical violence against us. Without this understanding our endless, unnamed, and undeclared wars will continue and our wonderful experience with liberty will end.



Congressman Paul in a Foreign Affairs Hearing on continued hostilities in Libya and the War Powers Resolution. Bonus Rep. Justin Amash statement in same hearing.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, May 21, 2011

Obama violates War Powers Act?

President Obama just about to deliver his Janu...Image via Wikipediahttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCAbgKfrBFw&feature=player_embedded#at=46
President Obama said the US would stay in Libya for days. Two months later, however, the War Powers Act says America needs to go to war or get out of North Africa. Can Obama circumvent the Constitution or is the Commander in Chief breaking the own laws he promises to uphold on the campaign trail? RT's Lauren Lyster investigates.



In Libya War, Obama Shows Disdain for War Powers Act

 http://www.progressive.org/wx052111.html
President Obama has again shown his disdain for the War Powers Act when it comes to Libya.

Under the War Powers Act, the President has 60 days to get authorization from Congress for any military involvement, and if he fails to get that authorization, he must end the involvement within 30 days.

The 60-day authorization period expired on Friday.

On Friday, President Obama belatedly and haughtily sent a letter to Congress seeking authorization. That letter said: "It has always been my view that it is better to take military action, even in limited actions such as this, with congressional engagement, consultation and support. Congressional action in support of the mission would underline the U.S. commitment to this remarkable international effort."

Note the phrase “it is better.” Obama acts as though getting approval from Congress is a mere option, not the law or the Constitution that he is obliged to follow.

If John McCain had been elected president in 2008 and had proceeded this way, Democrats would be up in arms, and progressives would be in the streets by the tens of thousands.

But the peace movement is quiescent, and almost all Democrats are silent (Sen. Harry Reid actually praised Obama’s consultation with Congress), except Dennis Kucinich.


Is President Obama About to Break the Law?

 http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2011/05/is-president-obama-about-to-break-the-law.html
From the beginning of the U.S. military intervention in Libya, the Obama administration has cited the 1973 War Powers Act as the legal basis of its ability to conduct military activities for 60 days without first seeking a declaration of war from Congress.

The military intervention started on March 19; Congress was notified on March 21.

Those 60 days expire tomorrow.

Last week, Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that President Obama “has been mindful of the provisions of the War Powers Resolution and has acted in a manner consistent with them. He will continue to do so.”

Steinberg said the administration is “mindful of the passage of time including the end of the two-month period, we are in the process of reviewing our role, and the president will be making decisions going forward in terms of what he sees as appropriate for us to do."

What is President Obama -– a former lecturer in constitutional law -- going to do? White House officials refused to say.

And the chorus of criticism -– from the right and left -- is rising.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Endless War Powers, Failed Drug Wars, Geitner Unchained, Texas Slaps TSA

The Reality Report. If you haven't had time to keep up with what is really going on the world. Here are a few of the latest videos. I have to say it's good to hear the Real News for a change. The Reality Report Rocks!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_35zBqw4JE&feature=channel_video_title


http://RTR.org | In today's top headlines, we present Texas House Bill HB 1937, which will stop the TSA from groping you. Obama is looking at the war on drugs a little differently and tell you why. We discuss a story about Obama's desire to make it legal for all presidents to declare war without Congressional consent. And we hit the debt ceiling but Geitner dosen't seem to mind.
http://RTR.org | Win a 1oz Ron Paul Silver Medallion! Spread the word about Ron Paul and win some silver, not a bad gig huh? CONTEST RULES: To enter your chance to win you must: Comment, Subscribe, AND Share this video. If you do not do ALL three you will not be eligible to win. We'll select a random commenter who has subscribed and shared the video and send a private message to your youtube channel. We will announce the winner on next week's show. Spread the Revolution!Medallion provided by http://FreedomMint.comhttp://RTR.org | Angie Ress breaks down the top stories this week, including: J. P. Morgan Chase investing in companies that support genocide, a North Carolina school district promoting vaccines by giving away prize incentives, Mozilla standing up to a U.S government takedown request and Arlington,TX partnering with DHS to be the first city in nation to allow unmanned drone fly overs.
Enhanced by Zemanta

May 17 - U.S. Congress To Set Stage for World War 3

Unofficial seal of the United States CongressImage via Wikipediahttp://slumz.boxden.com/f5/may-17-u-s-congress-set-vote-legislation-authorizes-official-start-world-war-3-a-1546519

We generally do not post on anything political but wanted to share this so that our readers could spread the word. So please read this and share so that we can stop this from being passed. I highly doubt we will be able to stop this from passing but it’s worth a try

The United States Congress is set to vote on legislation that authorizes the official start of World War 3.

The legislation authorizes the President of the United States to take unilateral military action against all nations, organizations, and persons, both domestically and abroad, who are alleged to be currently or who have in the past supported or engaged in hostilities or who have provided aid in support of hostilities against the United States or any of its coalition allies.

The legislation removes the requirement of congressional approval for the use of military force and instead gives the President totalitarian dictatorial authority to engage in any and all military actions for an indefinite period of time.

It even gives the President the authority to launch attacks against American Citizens inside the United States with no congressional oversight whatsoever.

Just to recap, because that was a mouthful:

* Endless War – The war will continue until all hostilities are terminated, which will never happen.
* No Borders – The president will have the full authority to launch military strikes against any country, organization or person, including against U.S citizens on U.S soil.
* Unilateral Military Action – Full authority to invade any nation at any time with no congressional approval required.
* No Clearly Defined Enemy – The US can declare or allege anyone a terrorist or allege they are or have been supporting “hostilities” against the US and attack at will.
* Authorization To Invade Several Countries – The president would have full authority to invade Iran, Syria, North Korea, along with several other nations in Africa and the Middle East and even Russia and China under the legislation all of which are “know” to have supported and aided hostilities against the United States.

I know the sound on this video is way overbearing. But I'm still trying to find more on here as well. Come back to see more.

THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS IS SET TO VOTE ON LEGISLATION T HAT AUTHORIZES THE OFFICIAL START OF WW3. BOTH ABROAD AND AT HOME, ANYTIME ANYWHERE, RECOGNIZING NO BORDERS!! Direct Web Link to article: http://bit.ly/lu1UKH (MIRRORED) Original Upload credit to JohnJDeHart68 on May 16, 2011
The sound on this one is much better.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, May 16, 2011

US government hits debt ceiling, lighting 11-week fuse - Politics Wires - MiamiHerald.com

The western front of the United States Capitol...Image via Wikipediahttp://www.miamiherald.com/2011/05/16/2219825/us-government-hits-debt-ceiling.html
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner informed Congress on Monday that the United States has reached its legal debt limit, setting off a ticking time bomb that could explode in less than three months if lawmakers can't bridge differences and allow more government borrowing.
In hitting the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling - the limit on how much the government can borrow - the Obama administration on Monday began temporarily halting payments to the retirement and federal pension accounts of federal workers and started borrowing from those funds, to be restored later.
Geithner sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., warning that the government can move money around for about 11 weeks but if a new debt ceiling isn't agreed to by Aug. 2, the U.S. government could effectively default on its obligations to its creditors. He warned of "catastrophic economic consequences for citizens" unless Congress raises the debt ceiling.
An increase of about $2 trillion is expected, enough to get the issue past the 2012 elections before Congress would have to lift it again.
Republicans who control the House of Representatives vow to link raising the debt ceiling to cuts in government spending of at least equal measure. In a combative statement Monday, House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, upped the ante.
"As I have said numerous times, there will be no debt limit increase without serious budget reforms and significant spending cuts, cuts that are greater than any increase in the debt limit." Boehner has called previously for $2 trillion in spending cuts as part of any deal to raise the debt ceiling.

Wisconsin Republican U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan, the chairman of the House Budget Committee, repeated the linkage in a speech Monday in Obama's adopted hometown.
"For every dollar the president wants to raise the debt ceiling, we can show him plenty of ways to cut far more than a dollar of spending," Ryan told the Economic Club of Chicago. "Given the magnitude of our debt burden, the size of the spending cuts should exceed the size of the president's debt limit increase."

Republicans rule out tax increases and any significant cuts in defense spending. The United States continues to fight wars in Iraq and Afghanistan paid for with borrowing, the only time in U.S. history that wars weren't offset at least partially with some sort of tax.
Democrats insist that Social Security is off the table, as is an end to Medicare, but they are open to changes in Medicare funding.
If Congress fails to raise the debt ceiling by Aug. 2, it would force the Obama administration to choose between paying creditors or paying for military operations, Social Security and Medicare payments, and other commitments.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, March 21, 2011

International alliance divided over Libya command. Is it Constitutional?

Constitution of the United States of AmericaImage by The U.S. National Archives via FlickrOne thing we don't seem to be hearing about at all in the news media today is, that we have a President that doesn't seem to think he has to go through Congress to make MAJOR decisions like this.
That's right our so called leader did not go through Congress to go to War.
ARTICLE 1, SECTION 8
The Congress shall have Power:
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water; 
To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years; 
To provide and maintain a Navy; 
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces; 
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; 
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress....




ARTICLE 1, SECTION 9

The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.
ARTICLE II, SECTION 2
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States....
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur....

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/03/21/kucinich_obama_ignored_constitution_his_own_advice_with_strikes_on_libya.html




 "If this was so grave, Congress is still in session. The President could have said 'don't go home, I've got to talk to you about what's happening here. I may need your approval.' This is about the Constitution and if we don't abide by our Constitution, everything falls apart here. This is about the Constitution, not about whether you like President Obama or not. I like President Obama, but I love the Constitution," Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) said on FOX News this morning.


This has even seemed to have woke up a few on the Democratic side as well.
See more here.
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/congress-the-president-and-war-powers-under-the-constitution/
Over the past 48 hours, there’s been much commentary about President Obama’s failure to obtain Congressional approval for American involvement in the actions against Libya to enforce UNSCR 1973 on both sides of the political aisle. Some Democrats in Congress were quick to speak out against the President’s decision, which they said he lacked legal authority to make:
A hard-core group of liberal House Democrats is questioning the constitutionality of U.S. missile strikes against Libya, with one lawmaker raising the prospect of impeachment during a Democratic Caucus conference call on Saturday.
Reps. Jerrold Nadler (N.Y.), Donna Edwards (Md.), Mike Capuano (Mass.), Dennis Kucinich (Ohio), Maxine Waters (Calif.), Rob Andrews (N.J.), Sheila Jackson Lee (Texas), Barbara Lee (Calif.) and Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D.C.) “all strongly raised objections to the constitutionality of the president’s actions” during that call, said two Democratic lawmakers who took part.
Kucinich, who wanted to bring impeachment articles against both former President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney over Iraq — only to be blocked by his own leadership — asked why the U.S. missile strikes aren’t impeachable offenses….
Saturday’s conference call was organized by Rep. John Larson (Conn.), chairman of the Democratic Caucus and the fourth-highest ranking party leader. Larson has called for Obama to seek congressional approval before committing the United States to any anti-Qadhafi military operation.
“They consulted the Arab League. They consulted the United Nations. They did not consult the United States Congress,” one Democrat lawmaker said of the White House. “They’re creating wreckage, and they can’t obviate that by saying there are no boots on the ground. … There aren’t boots on the ground; there are Tomahawks in the air.”
These liberal Democrats have been joined in their position by Republicans ranging from Richard Lugar to National Review’s Andrew McCarthy who wrote yesterday:
The Security Council is powerless to “authorize” the U.S. military to do a damned thing. The validity of American combat operations is a matter of American law, and that means Congress must authorize them.
Read more here. http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/congress-the-president-and-war-powers-under-the-constitution/
News from Yahoo today. Lets leave the States and explain it away out there. Does this seem fishy at all?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_theenvoy/20110321/ts_yblog_theenvoy/international-alliance-divided-over-libya-command

President Barack Obama, speaking in Santiago, Chile on Monday, defended his decision to order U.S. strikes against Libyan military targets, and insisted that the mission is clear.
And like a parade of Pentagon officials the past few days, Obama insisted that the United States' lead military role will be turned over—"in days, not weeks"—to an international command of which the United States will be just one part.
The only problem: None of the countries in the international coalition can yet agree on to whom or how the United States should hand off responsibilities.
The sense of urgency among White House officials to resolve the command dispute is profound: with each hour the U.S. remains in charge of yet another Middle East military intervention, Congress steps up criticism that Obama went to war in Libya without first getting its blessing, nor defining precisely what the end-game will be. (On Monday, Obama sent Congress official notification that he had ordered the U.S. military two days earlier to commence operations "to prevent humanitarian catastrophe" in Libya and support the international coalition implementing UN Security Council Resolution 1973.)
Below, an explainer on the military mission in Libya, the dispute over who should command it after its initial phase, and whether the military is concerned about mission creep.
What is the U.S. military task in Libya?
The military mission in Libya is implementing U.N. Security Council Resolution 1973, which calls for Gadhafi's forces to pull back from rebel-held towns, and the establishment of a no-fly zone to protect Libyan civilians from attack by Gadhafi, and for civilians to be allowed access to food, water and other humanitarian supplies.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

US to resume Guantanamo trials - Americas - Al Jazeera English

President George W. Bush and President-elect B...Image via Wikipediahttp://english.aljazeera.net//news/americas/2011/03/201137222725369240.html
The US president has approved the resumption of military trials for detainees at the Guantanamo Bay detention facility in Cuba.

The move ends a two-year ban and was the latest acknowledgement that the prison Barack Obama had vowed to shut down within a year of taking office will remain open for some time to come.

But even while announcing a resumption of military commission trials on Monday, Obama reaffirmed his support for trying terror suspects in US federal courts - something that has met resistance in Congress.

"I strongly believe that the American system of justice is a key part of our arsenal in the war against al-Qaeda and its affiliates, and we will continue to draw on all aspects of our justice system - including Article III courts - to ensure that our security and our values are strengthened,'' Obama said in a statement.

Saturday, December 4, 2010

Congress Forcing Vote on AMNESTY Bill TODAY!

WASHINGTON - NOVEMBER 4:   (L to R) Representa...Image by Getty Images via @daylifeBe sure to click the links for the full story and uses of the article.
http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/hostedemail/email.htm?h=c97dd08f3f8646ac589678c8976378d6&CID=7520173899&ch=9B573B8FBBF1B16267D91448B2CEB026
Pelosi and Reid are Forcing a vote on AMNESTY for Illegals -- Click Below to Tell Congress to REJECT the DREAM Act:
https://secure.conservativedonations.com/rm_dream/?a=5039

ALERT: Today could be the FINAL SHOWDOWN on liberal efforts to give AMNESTY

AND WE CAN STOP THEM – we, the People, have proven that AGAIN AND AGAIN.

Thanks to YOUR faxes, emails and phone calls this week -- Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid had to POSTPONE promised vote on the "DREAM Act" that would give AMNESTY to over TWO MILLION ILLEGAL ALIENS...


But now it's reported that BOTH Pelosi ANDl Reid are trying to FORCE THROUGH a vote on the DREAM Act, in the House AND the Senate... TODAY!

And on top of that, a coalition of amnesty-supporters has
launched a "six-figure ad campaign" to get Congress to pass their AMNESTY bill NOW, before the Republicans take over in January!

In other words... the Democrats are trying AGAIN to FORCE THROUGH a vote on their LAST-DITCH EFFORT TO PASS AMNESTY FOR ILLEGALS, and their friends are pouring out money to try to make sure that happens!

Why? Just FOLLOW THE MONEY: it's now being
revealed that the Congressional Budget Office, which analyzes the costs of bills, has a report ready showing the BILLIONS of dollars this bill will cost the American taxpayer... but Democrats are covering-up their analysis showing that granting illegal aliens amnesty under the DREAM Act will cost upwards of $20 billion.

Yes, that's right: $20 BILLION to give AMNESTY to ILLEGALS -- and they want a vote on this TODAY.

You and I STOPPED them from passing amnesty for illegals before, and we will NOT let the supporters of AMNESTY get away with this last-ditch attempt to violate the will of the PEOPLE -- but we need YOUR help to KEEP THE PRESSURE UP from the grassroots, and to COUNTER their ad campaign with our NATIONWIDE ad campaign!

TELL CONGRESS TO REJECT THIS NEW PUSH FOR
AMNESTY FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS:

SEND YOUR FAXES NOW!
AND HELP US RUN NATIONWIDE ADS!
We all thought that we finally got rid of the Nancy Pelosi, Democrat-led Congress when we voted on November 2nd -- but we were WRONG!

Pelosi has called the CURRENT Congress back for a "lame duck" session this week -- and high on her agenda of bills to pass before the Republicans take over is the bill we've warned you about for a while now: implementing mass legalization of potentially MILLIONS of illegal aliens through the appropriately-named DREAM Act.

No one thought that We, the People, could win when we fought against the forces pushing AMNESTY FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS two years ago.

But we DID win!

Now -- even though they LOST by HUGE margins in the recent mid-term elections -- the same left-wing crowd is pushing for amnesty AGAIN -- which means we have to FIGHT HARD AGAIN!

We all know that the far Left has been pushing for years to get full amnesty for all 20 million illegal aliens in the U.S. But now they know their time is short -- this is their LAST CHANCE to pass it before they lose their majority, and the Tea Party Republicans take over Congress.


So now their DOUBLING their efforts -- not only do they still want to get "comprehensive immigration reform" (that is, AMNESTY) passed in Congress; they're trying several NEW ways to "sneak through" amnesty -- starting by having Harry Reid bringing up the so-called "DREAM Act" as a stand-alone bill. And Nancy Pelosi is saying she'll do the SAME THING in the House -- backed by President Obama himself!

YOU HEARD THAT RIGHT -- the press is
reporting that "A last-minute push for the DREAM Act comes as Republicans prepare to take control of the House and pick up seats in the Senate in the 112th Congress, which convenes in January... Both Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said they would seek a vote on the measure in their respective chambers over Republican opposition."

So once again, these people will stop at NOTHING -- even the fact that THEY LOST THE ELECTION -- to get what they want. And this time, they want AMNESTY for illegals, whether the American people want it or not!

And that means WE have to take action NOW!

TELL CONGRESS TO REJECT THIS NEW PUSH FOR
AMNESTY FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS:

SEND YOUR FAXES NOW!
AND HELP US RUN NATIONWIDE ADS!
Now, let's be clear about this bill they want: they claim it's just a bill for illegal immigrant students who could earn legal status... but in reality, IT IS AN AMNESTY BILL. The DREAM Act was first proposed in 2000, and has been re-introduced in successive Congresses, including as recently as 2009. Neither chamber has since acted on the pending legislation, largely due to overwhelming opposition by the American public. It is a broad amnesty measure disguised as an educational initiative that would allow millions of illegal aliens who meet a very loose definition of "student" to qualify for green cards. Additionally, it provides in-state tuition benefits for illegal aliens that will DISPLACE legal residents competing for a fixed number of college admission slots and taxpayer subsidies.

Put simply: the DREAM Act allows children to keep what their parents STOLE for them!

Because of the STRONG opposition by American people, this bill already failed before in Congress. But that doesn't matter to these liberals; they now want to pass it before they lose their majority in January!

DO YOU GET IT? Once again, they're trying to IGNORE the wishes of the American people -- AND the law itself -- in order to give AMNESTY to millions of illegal aliens, which can open the door to granting MORE Amnesty to millions MORE illegals!

Enhanced by Zemanta

Action Alert 12/2/10 - Constitutional Emergency

"The American people don't believe anythi...Image by afagen via Flickrhttp://patriotsforamerica.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=2734278%3ABlogPost%3A229983&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_post
Ignoring the will of the people and betraying us (once again), the members of the Senate voted to PASS S 510 Food "Safety" Bill! FOURTEEN REPUBLICAN SENATORS were among those voting to pass this bill!

This bill, as you know, has NOTHING to do with Food "Safety" and EVERYTHING to do with exercising more control over the American people! If you had thoughts about planting a garden this coming Spring, think again! S 510 robs us of our God-given right to supply our own food!

If you feel betrayed as we do, join us in letting the fourteen Republican Senators know just what we think of their vote!
Visit our FAX Center and read the FAX. If it meets with your approval, request to send "S 510 Traitors" fax
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, November 12, 2010

Video BREAKING NEWS! We Told You So! The Congressional Research Service CONFIRMS IT!

The western front of the United States Capitol...Image via Wikipediahttp://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=225561
A congressional document posted on the Internet confirms no one – not Congress, not the states and not election officials – bothered to check Barack Obama's eligibility to be president, and that status remains undocumented to this day.
It's because state and federal law did not require anyone in Congress or elsewhere to check to see if Obama was a "natural born Citizen" under the meaning of Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution, according the document.
The analysis by the Congressional Research Service, a research arm of the U.S. Congress, openly admits no one in the federal government, including Congress, ever asked to see Obama's long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate. It explains no one was required to do so.
Get the free, in-depth special report on eligibility that could bring an end to Obama's presidency
Technically, the CRS is a public policy research arm of the United States Congress that is organized as a legislative branch agency within the Library of Congress; the CRS works exclusively for members of Congress, congressional committees and congressional staff in an advisory capacity, answering questions.

Hear Carl Gallups Live talk radio on NW FL's TALK RADIO - 1330 WEBY AM - broadcasting to a 4 state area on the Gulf Coast - every Friday afternoon - 4-6 pm CT.
FREEDOM FRIDAY RADIO WEBSITE
(Click the LISTEN LIVE button on Friday afternoons from 4-6 PM - Central Time - USA)
http://www.hickoryhammockbaptist.org/...
ORIGINAL WND ARTICLE
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE....
FREEDOM FRIDAY GIFT SHOP
Documentary DVD's - CD's - Radio Programs - T's - MORE!
FREE GIFTS! (At bottom of gift shop page)
http://www.hickoryhammockbaptist.org/...
PPSIMMONS FB Fan Club
http://www.facebook.com/pages/PPSIMMO...
STAUROS FILMS
http://www.hickoryhammockbaptist.org/...
Enhanced by Zemanta

Featured Post

The Truth about the Palestinian and Israeli conflict