Todays World News (@TodaysWorldNews) / Twitter

Showing posts with label George W. Bush. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George W. Bush. Show all posts

Thursday, August 18, 2011

Romney Courts Tea Party

LOS ANGELES, CA - JULY 20:  Republican preside...Image by Getty Images via @daylifehttp://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/romney-tea-party-primaries/2011/08/17/id/407745?s=al&promo_code=CDB8-1
Faced with growing grass-roots momentum for Texas Gov. Rick Perry, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney launched a charm offensive of sorts on Wednesday, casting himself as a friend of the tea party that otherwise probably would oppose him.

Romney met with 25 steelworkers in northern New Hampshire and fielded a question about whether he considers himself a member of the tea party.

"I don't know that you sign a membership," replied Romney. "What I consider myself is someone who is in sync with the tea party.”

mitt romney new hampshire tea partyThat remark was just the latest indication Romney may seek to blur the distinction between the establishment and grass-roots wings of the Republican Party. Observers say he may not need to win a lot of tea party support as long as he can blunt tea partyers' active opposition.

Romney already has earned the grudging respect of one key tea party leader in Congress, Rep. Jason Chaffetz of Utah.

Chaffetz, the popular tea party figure who is weighing a primary challenge against incumbent GOP Sen. Orrin Hatch, has endorsed Romney.

“Mitt Romney is in the best position to beat Barack Obama,” Chaffetz said, explaining his endorsement, “and I really want to beat Barack Obama.”

With a few more staunch conservatives like Chaffetz in his corner, Romney's strategy may prove formidable, some pundits say.

“I do see Romney making headway with the tea party, but later in the race as the ‘electable’ candidates winnow down,” pollster and syndicated columnist Matt Towery tells Newsmax. “I’m getting a sense that Romney is much like George W. Bush in 2000 — at first, the darling of the establishment; later, the hero of conservatives.”

So far, the consensus is that, as long as Romney is up against Rep. Michele Bachmann, Perry, and Texas Rep. Ron Paul — who trailed Bachmann by only a razor-thin 152 votes in the Iowa Straw Poll — he won’t find much oxygen left under the tea party tent.

But singing the tea party tune could still bring him political benefits, according to Tea Party Patriots co-founder Mark Meckler.

“Tea party values are carrying the day right now,” Meckler tells Newsmax. “Romney has to appeal to that regardless of whether he thinks he’s the tea party guy. He’s got to speak to those values, or he doesn’t have a chance.”

As for how simpatico Romney is with the tea party, Meckler states: “In recent weeks, he’s said things that I wouldn’t say are in sync with the tea party. Like expressing his support for the concept of man-made global warming. That’s not in synch with most people in the tea party.

“Also, his position on forced energy efficiency is not in sync with the tea party. So he’s got positions, that I don’t think are in sync with the tea party, that he has stated openly in recent weeks.”

That suggests Romney may have to sip a lot more tea on the campaign trail before he can expect to garner significant grass-roots support.

In fact, one grass-roots group, Western Representation PAC, already has launched an anybody-but-Romney campaign called “Stop Romney.”

FreedomWorks has expressed strong opposition to him as well, warning that a Romney nomination could discourage many tea party members from taking an activist role in 2012.

Read more on Newsmax.com: Romney Courts Tea Party
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!
Enhanced by Zemanta

Rick Perry on Al Gore, the NAFTA Superhighway, and Bilderberg

Perry Event 2/1/2010Image via Wikipediahttp://www.prisonplanet.com/rick-perry-on-al-gore-the-nafta-superhighway-and-bilderberg.html
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
August 16, 2011
If Rick Perry is going to successfully project the image of a god-fearing Christian Tea Party Republican, he will have to put distance between himself and Al Gore.
In 1988, Perry not only supported Gore, he was his campaign manager in Texas. After Gore lost to Michael Dukakis and then Dukakis lost the election in a landslide to Bush Senior, Perry jumped parties. He became a Republican in 1989.
During a an interview on Des Moines-based WHO on Monday, Perry said he worked with Gore “before he invented the Internet and got to be Mr. Global Warming.” Growing up in rural Texas, Perry said “I never met a Republican until I was 25… In 1988 when you looked at the candidates, Al Gore was the most conservative candidate that was out there.”
Either Perry wasn’t paying attention or he is trying to lie his way out of his past association with Gore. In April of 1987, according to Politico, Gore was already preaching his warmist mantra.
“He laid out a broad list of national objectives, from combating AIDS and Alzheimer’s disease to curbing the ‘greenhouse effect’ — the threat to the Earth’s atmosphere from the burning of oil, gas and coal,” The Los Angeles Times reported in covering Gore’s announcement. In May 1987, according to The Washington Post, his stump speeches included a call for the nation to “confront the emerging problems of the greenhouse effect and the threat to our ozone,” notes Politico.


See more at the link.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/rick-perry-on-al-gore-the-nafta-superhighway-and-bilderberg.html
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, May 23, 2011

Does Obama Think Jerusalem is Outside Israel?

Jerusalem on the mapImage via Wikipediahttp://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/144430
The United States State Department is standing behind the wording of an official statement that implied that Jerusalem – including its western parts - is not a part of Israel. Against the backdrop of President Barack Obama's speech calling on Israel to return to the 1949 Armistice lines, the statement's implications appear more alarming.
The May 18 statement was cited in a Weekly Standard column by Eliot Abrams, a former foreign policy advisor for presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush.
Abrams wrote: 
“In what country is the Knesset?… [I]t seems that this question has stumped the State Department. It does not know or will not say what country the Knesset is in, nor—one must assume—does it know what country the Prime Minister’s Office, the Israel Museum, or especially the Western Wall are in. 
He quotes a “remarkable” press release from the State Department about the travels of Deputy Secretary James Steinberg, which says: 
Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg visits Israel, Jerusalem and the West Bank [our emphasis, ed.] May 18-19, 2011. In Israel, Deputy Secretary Steinberg met with Israeli academic and student leaders. In the West Bank, he met with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and other Palestinian officials. Among other issues, he discussed moving forward on Middle East peace as well as the recent fundamental changes in the region and the United States’ response to them.  On May 19, he will participate in the U.S.-Israel Strategic Dialogue. The Strategic Dialogue allows senior U.S. and Israeli leaders to discuss, on a regular basis and in depth, the many issues that affect our mutual security and partnership.
The wording of the statement seems to imply that Jerusalem is outside Israel. Since Steinberg’s visit included a meeting with Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon in the Foreign Ministry, which is in western Jerusalem,  the implication seems to be that western Jerusalem, too, is separate from Israel.
“I suppose the poor benighted Israelis believed they were hosting Steinberg in their country when he visited government offices,” Abrams wrote sarcastically. “But he knew better.  What makes this especially egregious is that Israeli government offices—where Mr. Steinberg would have had his official meetings—are actually in west Jerusalem, the portion Israel controlled even before 1967. Yet the Clinton State Department is apparently unwilling to call even that portion of the city ‘Israel.’”
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Obama Insists Israel Withdraw to Fantasyland and Netanyahu Objects

Map of Israel, the Palestinian territories (We...Image via Wikipediahttp://www.whitehousedossier.com/2011/05/19/obama-insists-israel-withdraw-fantasyland
Sometimes I get the impression with President Obama that his wishes and plans steam forward in one lane, while reality marches along in another altogether separate one.
We see this, for example, on the budget deficit, where the president notes the peril it poses, and then goes right ahead and throws around billions in “emergency” stimulus money that take years to dole out. Or adds a trillion dollars in new spending to make his health care dream a reality.
And we saw it again today, in Obama’s latest Middle East Big Think speech.
Despite the coming new regime in the Palestinian Authority, which will include Hamas, Obama has gone along his merry way and made a key concession to the Palestinians, as if Israel’s peril had some how lessened rather than grown.
By making it U.S. policy that the 1967 borders are the STARTING POINT for negotiations, Obama put Israel on the defensive in its fight for security and for its cultural – and the Christian cultural – heritage in Jerusalem.
The statement overturns assurances by George W. Bush to Israel in a 2004 letter that stated a return to the 1967 borders was in fact NOT the policy of the United States. This assurance was made in return for a concrete step, the withdrawal of Israel from Gaza. The concrete step cannot be reversed. The assurance could be reversed by an unreliable ally. Today, it was.
It was a DEAL. A deal is a deal, right? Wrong.
Obama today said the status of Jerusalem is up for grabs. But by declaring as the starting point the 1967 border – under which the Old City portion of Jerusalem and its holy sites were in Arab hands – Israel now has give concessions to keep Jerusalem whole, not get concessions in return for giving it away. And as a practical matter, putting Old City Jerusalem in the hands of the Palestinians at the start of the negotiations means they will never relinquish it.
How well the Arabs will protect Jewish and Christian holy sites there is anyone’s guess.
And by the way, go to Google and take a look at a map of the 1967 borders.
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Peace/borders.html


It doesn’t take some kind of Napoleonic military genius to figure out that the borders are completely indefensible. Israel, again, will have to bargain from a position of weakness – the ’67 borders – to “swap,” as Obama put it, enough of its land for West Bank land to find a marginally secure arrangement of territory.
Look at what the Gaza giveaway has gotten Israel. Missiles regularly lobbed deep into its territory and a funnel for terrorists and arms. What will happen when it releases the West Bank?
The Palestinians don’t want the West Bank. They want it all. They want Tel Aviv. The West Bank will be a ballast used for pushing the Jews into the sea.
Sure, Obama says the Palestinians will have to find a way to reassure Israel with Hamas now at the table. And he promises Israel secure borders. But these are nebulous words, negotiable stuff. The 1967 borders line he read today is policy.

The Good News is Netanyahu looks like he objects to this.

Netanyahu Objects to Obama's Backing of 1967 Borders

 http://www.newser.com/story/118982/benjamin-netanyahu-on-twitter-israel-pm-criticizes-president-obamas-mideast-speech.html
(Newser) – Benjamin Netanyahu’s office has tweeted its response to President Obama’s Middle East speech—and the prime minister isn’t happy with Obama’s support for a peace plan based on Israel’s 1967 borders. “The viability of a Palestinian state ... cannot come at the expense of the viability of the one and only Jewish state,” the office said in one of a series of tweets compiled by ABC's Political Punch blog. Another said Israel wants Obama to reaffirm a letter from George W. Bush in 2004 that did not call for a return to the 1967 borders. 

Allen West: Obama's Recognition of Pre-1967 Borders 'Beginning of the End' for Jewish State


Read more on Newsmax.com: Allen West: Obama's Middle East Policy 'Beginning of the End' for Israel
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!
Conservatives led by Florida Republican Allen West Thursday were quick to blast President Barack Obama's game-changing recognition of a Palestinian state existing along Israel's pre-1967 borders — a decision that many described as an existential threat for the Jewish state.

"Today’s endorsement by President Barack Obama of the creation of a Hamas-led Palestinian state based on the pre-1967 borders, signals the most egregious foreign policy decision his administration has made to date, and could be the beginning of the end as we know it for the Jewish state," said West, R-Fla., one of the leading Tea Party thinkers in the House Republican freshman class," West said in a prepared statement.

"From the moment the modern day state of Israel declared statehood in 1948, to the end of the 1967 Six Day War, Jews were forbidden access to their holiest site, the Western Wall in Jerusalem’s Old City, controlled by Jordan’s Arab army.

"The pre-1967 borders endorsed by President Obama would deny millions of the world’s Jews access to their holiest site and force Israel to return the strategically important Golan Heights to Syria, a known state-sponsor of terrorism," said West, a career military veteran of the war in Iraq.

"Resorting to the pre-1967 borders would mean a full withdrawal by the Israelis from the West Bank and the Jewish neighborhoods of East Jerusalem. Make no mistake, there has always been a Nation of Israel and Jerusalem has been and must always be recognized as its rightful capital.

"In short, the Hamas-run Palestinian state envisioned by President Obama would be devastating to Israel and the world’s 13.3 million Jews. It would be a Pavlovian style reward to a declared Islamic terrorist organization, and an unacceptable policy initiative.

"America should never negotiate with the Palestinian Authority- which has aligned itself with Hamas. Palestine is a region, not a people or a modern state. Based upon Roman Emperor Hadrian's declaration in 73 AD, the original Palestinian people are the Jewish people.

Read more on Newsmax.com: Allen West: Obama's Middle East Policy 'Beginning of the End' for Israel
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!

Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, May 2, 2011

Islam Praying Osama's death not true. Bringing more Threats from Islam.

Hadith Oliyankara Juma MasjidImage via WikipediaAs most of America is Rejoicing today over the Death of Osama bin Laden. The question still remains. Where is the body? Not only are more and more Americans waiting for this proof so is all of Islam, I keep hearing that somehow they buried his body at sea? If this is the case could our so called fearless President be any more of an Idiot?
Another cover-up? Other news of Fox reports saying that he was killed in a missile strike about a week ago.  Like media from pages like this.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/breaking-report-osama-bin-laden-is-dead-u-s-has-the-body/
Though I haven't seen the actual article yet. I will post it if I do though. The fact of the matter is. The Proof needs to be shown around the world. Islam will wind up trying to strike as they think he died a Martyr. That fact is. His death is not as a Martyr should die. As the news states he was flat out shot down. He didn't kill anyone in the process and coward behind a women as a shield. This is not an Islamic Martyr. This means he died as pathetic as it gets.
As America is joining together we need to remember. It isn't over. We will hear many different stories. Mostly from the Islamic World trying to prove how fake it is. This is the Time for America to stand together and stand strong. If Obama was somehow a smart man. He would show us all the real proof and fast.
Islam is not taking this lightly as we see in the article below..
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/02/us-binladen-reaction-idUSTRE7415VM20110502


Americans celebrated on the streets and U.S. markets rallied on hopes bin Laden's death could ease the threats hanging over much of the developed world -- but even President Barack Obama said that terrorist attacks would continue to be a concern.
Interpol predicted a heightened risk and called for extra vigilance in case followers sought revenge for the killing of the man who became the global face of terror, even if he no longer had tactical control of al Qaeda actions.
Members of militant Islamist forums vowed to avenge bin Laden's death and CIA Director Leon Panetta said al Qaeda would "almost certainly" attempt some form of retaliation.
Roland Jacquard, head of the International Terrorism Observatory in Paris, said the United States would be targeted.
"The way in which he was killed, by a military commando, shows this will have important consequences for the future. It will be a call for Jihad, he will remain a very real-life martyr for the rest of the organization," Jacquard told RTL radio.
Islamic militants prayed the news of bin Laden's death was false, or else vowed revenge in comments on online forums.
"Oh God, please make this news not true... God curse you Obama," said one message on an Arabic language forum. "Oh Americans... it is still legal for us to cut your necks."
A man identified as a prominent member of the jihadist internet community by monitoring group SITE said revenge would be taken for the death of "the Sheikh of Islam."
"Osama may be killed but his message of Jihad will never die. Brothers and sisters, wait and see, his death will be a blessing in disguise," said a poster on another Islamist forum.
Experts fear the only blow to al Qaeda will be psychological.
CONSTANT ALERT
In Washington, a crowd gathered outside the White House as Obama announced the conclusion of a decade-long manhunt, singing patriotic songs and chanting slogans.
The killing was hailed by George W. Bush, who was president when al Qaeda hijackers slammed airliners into the Pentagon and New York's World Trade Center.
"The fight against terror goes on, but tonight America has sent an unmistakable message: No matter how long it takes, justice will be done," Bush said. New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg said he hoped the news would bring closure to those who lost loved ones on September 11.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, April 7, 2011

GOP lawyer drafts Obama impeachment – Patriot Update

2009 Five Presidents George W. Bush, President...Image by Beverly & Pack via Flickrhttp://patriotupdate.com/5220/gop-lawyer-drafts-obama-impeachment
A prominent libertarian constitutional lawyer and civil libertarian has drafted an article of impeachment against President Obama over his attack on Libya, throwing down a legal gauntlet that could be picked up by some Congressional Republicans
Bruce Fein, a former Reagan administration official in the Department of Justice and chairman of American Freedom Agenda writes in his 15-page argument of Obama’s course that “Barack Hussein Obama has mocked the rule of law, endangered the very existence of the Republic and the liberties of the people, and perpetrated an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor.”
Fein is a small-government conservative who worked on the impeachment of President Bill Clinton and also called for the impeachment of President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney, and his work doesn’t represent the Republican Party line. But it comes as some Republicans on the Hill, led by Senator Rand Paul, object vociferously to Obama’s decision to strike targets in Libya without Congressional authorization.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, March 21, 2011

International alliance divided over Libya command. Is it Constitutional?

Constitution of the United States of AmericaImage by The U.S. National Archives via FlickrOne thing we don't seem to be hearing about at all in the news media today is, that we have a President that doesn't seem to think he has to go through Congress to make MAJOR decisions like this.
That's right our so called leader did not go through Congress to go to War.
ARTICLE 1, SECTION 8
The Congress shall have Power:
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water; 
To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years; 
To provide and maintain a Navy; 
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces; 
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; 
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress....




ARTICLE 1, SECTION 9

The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.
ARTICLE II, SECTION 2
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States....
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur....

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/03/21/kucinich_obama_ignored_constitution_his_own_advice_with_strikes_on_libya.html




 "If this was so grave, Congress is still in session. The President could have said 'don't go home, I've got to talk to you about what's happening here. I may need your approval.' This is about the Constitution and if we don't abide by our Constitution, everything falls apart here. This is about the Constitution, not about whether you like President Obama or not. I like President Obama, but I love the Constitution," Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) said on FOX News this morning.


This has even seemed to have woke up a few on the Democratic side as well.
See more here.
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/congress-the-president-and-war-powers-under-the-constitution/
Over the past 48 hours, there’s been much commentary about President Obama’s failure to obtain Congressional approval for American involvement in the actions against Libya to enforce UNSCR 1973 on both sides of the political aisle. Some Democrats in Congress were quick to speak out against the President’s decision, which they said he lacked legal authority to make:
A hard-core group of liberal House Democrats is questioning the constitutionality of U.S. missile strikes against Libya, with one lawmaker raising the prospect of impeachment during a Democratic Caucus conference call on Saturday.
Reps. Jerrold Nadler (N.Y.), Donna Edwards (Md.), Mike Capuano (Mass.), Dennis Kucinich (Ohio), Maxine Waters (Calif.), Rob Andrews (N.J.), Sheila Jackson Lee (Texas), Barbara Lee (Calif.) and Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D.C.) “all strongly raised objections to the constitutionality of the president’s actions” during that call, said two Democratic lawmakers who took part.
Kucinich, who wanted to bring impeachment articles against both former President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney over Iraq — only to be blocked by his own leadership — asked why the U.S. missile strikes aren’t impeachable offenses….
Saturday’s conference call was organized by Rep. John Larson (Conn.), chairman of the Democratic Caucus and the fourth-highest ranking party leader. Larson has called for Obama to seek congressional approval before committing the United States to any anti-Qadhafi military operation.
“They consulted the Arab League. They consulted the United Nations. They did not consult the United States Congress,” one Democrat lawmaker said of the White House. “They’re creating wreckage, and they can’t obviate that by saying there are no boots on the ground. … There aren’t boots on the ground; there are Tomahawks in the air.”
These liberal Democrats have been joined in their position by Republicans ranging from Richard Lugar to National Review’s Andrew McCarthy who wrote yesterday:
The Security Council is powerless to “authorize” the U.S. military to do a damned thing. The validity of American combat operations is a matter of American law, and that means Congress must authorize them.
Read more here. http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/congress-the-president-and-war-powers-under-the-constitution/
News from Yahoo today. Lets leave the States and explain it away out there. Does this seem fishy at all?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_theenvoy/20110321/ts_yblog_theenvoy/international-alliance-divided-over-libya-command

President Barack Obama, speaking in Santiago, Chile on Monday, defended his decision to order U.S. strikes against Libyan military targets, and insisted that the mission is clear.
And like a parade of Pentagon officials the past few days, Obama insisted that the United States' lead military role will be turned over—"in days, not weeks"—to an international command of which the United States will be just one part.
The only problem: None of the countries in the international coalition can yet agree on to whom or how the United States should hand off responsibilities.
The sense of urgency among White House officials to resolve the command dispute is profound: with each hour the U.S. remains in charge of yet another Middle East military intervention, Congress steps up criticism that Obama went to war in Libya without first getting its blessing, nor defining precisely what the end-game will be. (On Monday, Obama sent Congress official notification that he had ordered the U.S. military two days earlier to commence operations "to prevent humanitarian catastrophe" in Libya and support the international coalition implementing UN Security Council Resolution 1973.)
Below, an explainer on the military mission in Libya, the dispute over who should command it after its initial phase, and whether the military is concerned about mission creep.
What is the U.S. military task in Libya?
The military mission in Libya is implementing U.N. Security Council Resolution 1973, which calls for Gadhafi's forces to pull back from rebel-held towns, and the establishment of a no-fly zone to protect Libyan civilians from attack by Gadhafi, and for civilians to be allowed access to food, water and other humanitarian supplies.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, January 21, 2011

NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams:Commanders of Desert Storm talk about what happened

Saddam Hussein EjecutadoImage by haddybello via Flickrhttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032619/ns/nightly_news
What so many arguments today deal with is around the so called oil that media has played so many times when dealing with Iraq and the wars. Hear from the first President Bush and the people surrounding him at the time it all started.
So many seemed to have forgotten the entire dictatorship of Saddam Hussein and how evil and vicious this man was and the murders he inflicted on his own people.
Take the time and listen to what it was all about. Also note how the beginning of the NWO is stated here and who said it.
First video is the entire interview. The second deals on the issue of oil.




Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, January 1, 2011

The Hal Lindsey Report - Videos

As I read the Bible, I still question many areas about the removal of the Church. But, In this video. It might help more people to understand what is really going on in this world.
All the events are happening right now. Question is are you willing to listen? And, for those that do, Are you ready?
http://www.hallindsey.com/videos

Hal Lindsey Report: 12/10/2010
12/12/2010 | 28.29



Hal Lindsey Report: 12/10/2010
12/12/2010 | 28.29

Just in case you missed the last one you might want to check it out here.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, November 18, 2010

Unveiled: Constitution for New Socialist North America

Simplified hammer and sickle logoImage via Wikipediahttp://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=229305
NEW ORLEANS, La. – The Revolutionary Communist Party USA has announced a "Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America," and members say they are planning for a "revolution" against capitalism, with violence if necessary.
The "present capitalist-imperialist system" should be replaced with a "radically new economic system," they say.
Carl Dix, a founding member and spokesman, believes that the federal government bailouts, under both George W. Bush and Barack Obama, are just one instance where they propped up what he calls the "capitalist class." His party is "building a revolution" and under the proposed constitution all "natural resources [would] be collectively owned," with the goal of a "classless, communist world," he said.
"We have to move to a point where people can work in common for the common good and get back what they need to live a life worthy of human beings. … The competitiveness and the looking out for No. 1 that's promoted in this society – that kind of thinking has to be broken," he said after the "constitution" was announced this week.
The RCP, founded in 1975 with roots in the New Left of the 1960s and 1970s era, has active chapters in at least 15 population centers and publishes "Revolution," a biweekly newspaper and website. RCP leaders believe "elections are not the arena where decisions are made about the future direction of the society" and do not participate.
(Story continues below)
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=229305
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, October 15, 2010

The Weakening Of The United States National Defenses By President Obama - Tea Party Nation

Large stockpile with global range (dark blue),...Image via Wikipedia The picture on the right show which countries have nuclear missiles with Global Reach. If we loose ours guess what happens?
http://www.teapartynation.com/profiles/blogs/the-weakening-of-the-united
As I read through all this. I was actually surprised that so many other haven't realized this since it's been all over the news the past couple of years. I have to totally agree. Obama seems to want America Weak for some reason. Only God knows why.

Click the link to see the rest of the story.

In just the past week President Obama has made this country look week on defense. This is where he has made the United States look weak:

1. His new nuclear weapons strategy,

2. The banning of certain terms from the national Security Document,

3. The nuclear weapons treaty signed with Russia,

4. If the US is attacked with chemical or biological weapons that the nuclear option is off the table for retaliation.

The combination of all of these together make this country look weak to it's enemies around the world. You need to look strong to your enemies to prevent attacks against this country and its people here and abroad around the world. President Bush kept this country safe from attack for 8 years after 9/11 there was no attack on US soil. President Bush took the fight to the terrorists. In just president Obama's first year in office there were to attacks in this country which were the shooting at Fort Hood and the Christmas Day bomber. These were small attacks but it shows that terrorist do not fear president Obama in what he might do as they Feared president Bush. I fear that before President Obama is out of Office there will be a big attack on US soil. I pray this doesn't happen by I do fear it more as he weakens our national defenses.

In his nuclear weapons strategy which will reverse 65 years of US nuclear weapons policy. This will lessons the deterrence factor that US has by having the nuclear weapons. By lessoning its deterrence factor it allows the US to be more vulnerable to attack by nuclear states and soon be nuclear states or would be nuclear states. His idea for doing this is to keep terrorist from acquiring nuclear weapons is naive at best. This will not stop countries like Iran from trying to squire nuclear weapons or halt North Korea from continuing to build its nuclear arsenal.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Ahmadinejad: US and Israel plot wars within three months

TEHRAN. With the President of Iran, Mahmoud Ah...Image via Wikipedia
Every time I hear this guy talk, I seem to realize all he wants is a war. Just as the Islamic Koran tells them to create. The Bloodiest War mankind has ever seen. Otherwise known as the Holy War, Jihad and what most of us know as Armageddon.
clipped from www.debka.com
Ahmadinejad: US and Israel plot wars within three months

debkafile's Iranian sources quote President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as saying: "We have precise information that the Americans have devised a plot, according to which they seek to launch a psychological war on Iran. They plan to attack at least two countries in the region within the next three months," he said, without specifying which countries were the subjects of the alleged conspiracy, only hinting that America's senior military ally in the region, Israel, was directly involved.
Ahmadinejad spoke Monday night, July 26, in an interview restricted to the controlled Iranian media which make a point of stressing the late hour.
The Iranian president ended the interview with a warning to US President Barack Obama not to follow in the footsteps of George W. Bush by sending US troops to fight new Middle East wars.
He also had a piece of advice for Moscow: Not to play into Washington's hands and thereby hurt Russian interests.
blog it
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

US Jobs Data: One Reason Why It Might Not Be Getting Better

In January 2009, President of the United State...Image via Wikipedia
I keep hearing the news talk about jobs getting better. But then again. I have noticed that most of those jobs are from the census bureau.
I mean really a 2 week job is what they are counting as jobs?
I bet many don't realize the impact of this administration.
The worst ever.
clipped from dailyreckoning.com

US Jobs Data: One Reason Why It Might Not Be Getting Better

leadimage
Ever Had A Job?
A chart that showed past presidents and the percentage of each president’s cabinet appointees who had previously worked in the private sector – you know, a real life business, not a government job? Remember what that is? A private business?




  • Roosevelt – 38%








  • Taft – 40%








  • Wilson – 52%








  • Harding – 49%








  • Coolidge – 48%








  • Hoover – 42%








  • FDR – 50%








  • Truman – 50%








  • Eisenhower – 57%








  • Kennedy – 30%








  • LBJ – 47%








  • Nixon – 53%








  • Ford – 42%








  • Carter – 32%








  • Reagan – 56%








  • GHWB – 51%








  • Clinton – 39%








  • GWB – 55%




  • And the Chicken Dinner Winner is…………………….




  • Obama – 8%*




  • This is the guy who wants to tell YOU how to run YOUR life!
    ONLY ONE IN TWELVE in the Obama Cabinet HAS EVER HAD A JOB.
    *YEP, EIGHT PERCENT!
    And these are the guys holding a “job summit”; going to tell us how to
    run our businesses, make our decisions for us? Do you want to trust them
    with every aspect of your life?
    blog it
    Enhanced by Zemanta

    Featured Post

    The Truth about the Palestinian and Israeli conflict