Bikers protest Westboro Baptist demonstrators at Arlington burial

Image via WikipediaI have to say I like the Bikers of America. They know when to stand up when its time. To see how  they took control of the situation here is just Awesome.
As a Christian these people tick me off. I said it before and I will say it again. These protesters have no right to call themselves Christian. Nothing they are doing has anything to do with being Christ Like.
But, to see how the Bikers of America rode in to drown them out? This is totally classic. I hope to see much more of this when it comes to these wanna call themselves Christian lunatics.
Be sure to see the video and the rest of the story at the link.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/04/AR2010100406662.html
A group of motorcyclists staged a counter-demonstration Monday at the Arlington National Cemetery burial of a local Navy SEAL, parking motorcycles and revving engines to oppose a protest by members of the fundamentalist Westboro Baptist Church of Kansas.

The motorcyclists, many clad in boots and leather, lined up along Memorial Drive in front of the small group of protesters, opened the throttles of their engines to drown their singing and saluted as the funeral cortege passed.
Members of Westboro, who often demonstrate at military funerals, are the subjects of a Supreme Court case that seeks to decide whether they have a right under the Constitution to stage such inflammatory demonstrations.
The court is scheduled to hear oral arguments in the case Wednesday.

Related articles

• 1st Amendment protects military funeral protesters (thenewstribune.com)
• Free Speech? Oh, Pleeease! (therecoveringlegalist.com)
• Religious extremists banned from picketing Arizona shooting funeral; Westboro Baptist church planned to disrupt service for nine-year-old Christina Taylor Gree (guardian.co.uk)
• "Westboro Baptist Church to Picket Funeral of 9-Yr-Old Girl Murdered in Tucson" and related posts (theodoresworld.net)
• Tucson residents fight to keep extremists from child's funeral (guardian.co.uk)
• Arizonans Rally to Prevent Westboro Church Disruption of Shooting Victims' Funerals - FoxNews.com (beetljooz.wordpress.com)
• Religious extremists banned from picketing Arizona shooting funeral - The Guardian (news.google.com)
• Arizona Unites Against Funeral Protest (foxnews.com)

Kagan Has "Confirmation Conversion..." But Religion Is Still Gun Control

Kagan Has "Confirmation Conversion..." But Religion Is Still Gun Control

3 minutes ago from todaysworld

• 
  
• 
  
  read more on us1.campaign-archive.com
  

  ALERT: THE LIBERALS WANT TO DESTROY OUR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS SO THEY CAN LIVE OUT THEIR FANTASY: A GLOBAL GUN BAN. OBAMA IS STAFFING THE SUPREME COURT WITH THE MOST RADICAL PROGRESSIVES IN HISTORY SO THEY CAN VOTE TO ANNIHILATE THE SECOND AMENDMENT. SOTOMAYOR AND NOW KAGAN WILL HELP THE LIBERAL ELITES CARRY OUT THEIR PLAN TO TAKE AWAY YOUR GUNS.
  TELL EVERY SINGLE SENATOR TO FILIBUSTER Obama's Supreme Court Nominee: SEND YOUR FAXES NOW!
  Obama is scheming to execute his master plan: to shred our Constitution to pieces. He is weaseling in Liberal activist judges into the Supreme Court so the Liberals can vote our rights away. Pretty soon our Constitution will become something we can only read in history books.
  First, Obama pushed the extreme leftie nut job Sonia Sotomayor into the Supreme Court. Sotomayor's only big accomplishment was grabbing guns from law-abiding American citizens.
  Agree That "The Second Amendment Right Is An Individual Right"---Select Below to Tell Congress They Must Vote No To Kagan---NOW!
  TELL EVERY SINGLE SENATOR TO FILIBUSTER Obama's Supreme Court Nominee: SEND YOUR FAXES NOW!
• 
  
  read more on us1.campaign-archive.com
  On Monday, Sotomayor voted against the Second Amendment. Apparently, telling the truth is not Sotomayor's strong point. To explain her anti-Constitution vote she said she couldn't find anything in the Constitution that said the Second Amendment that protected citizen's rights to bear arms. Sotomayer needs to brush up on her history. The Second Amendment was CREATED AND WRITTEN TO ensure our right to own firearms is not taken away.
• 
  
  read more on us1.campaign-archive.com
  OBAMA TO FILL SUPREME COURT WITH ANTI-GUN CRUSADERS
  Obama is trying to convince America that Kagan is a moderate judge who will rule fairly. Kagan is an extreme Liberal activist judge who will vote to destroy our right to keep and bear arms. Even more disturbing is Kagan and Sotomayor will likely conspire to further push their anti-gun personal politics.
• 
  
  read more on us1.campaign-archive.com
  
  THIS IS A FIGHT WE CAN'T AFFORD TO LOSE. YOUR FUTURE IS AT STAKE AND ALSO THE FUTURE OF YOUR FAMILY.
  TELL EVERY SINGLE SENATOR TO FILIBUSTER Obama's Supreme Court Nominee: SEND YOUR FAXES NOW!
  Every Supreme Court Justice is selected for one reason: to uphold the constitution. Clearly, Elena Kagan has other agendas.
  OUR COUNTRIES SECURITY IS AT STAKE AND ELENA KAGAN IS NOT LOOKING OUT FOR AMERICA
  Please, take action right away to DEMAND that Senators ENSURE that there is no place on the Supreme Court for personal beliefs that trump America's safety.
• 
  
  read more on us1.campaign-archive.com
  For more information, visit www.AmeriPAC.org
  Sincerely,
  Alan M. Gottlieb
  Chairman, AmeriPAC
  www.AmeriPAC.org
• 
  
  read more on us1.campaign-archive.com

Share 

0comments       

See and download the full gallery on posterous

Posted via email from Todays World

Related articles by Zemanta

• Good news, bad news for gun rights (michellemalkin.com)
• How Republican Senators Plan to Vote on Kagan (thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com)
• Fact: Kagan is Anti-Second Amendment (redstate.com)
• NRA Opposed To Kagan Nomination To U.S. Supreme Court (gloucestercitynews.net)
• Gun rights organization _ NRA - against Kagan (dailycaller.com)
• Gun rights organization NRA against Kagan (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• National Rifle Association Opposes Kagan Nomination (Update3) (businessweek.com)
• N.R.A. Says It Opposes Kagan Nomination (nytimes.com)
• John McCain: I'm Voting Against Elena Kagan (cbsnews.com)
• Gun Liberty (lewrockwell.com)

Troubling Issues with Democrats and Guns

Troubling Issues with Democrats and Guns

11 minutes ago from todaysworld

• 
  
  read more on harrisonprice.com
  Liberals do not want to face the reality that criminals do not acquire their firearms by going down to the local gun store, getting a background check, and paying tax for their purchase… they get them on the black market.  Because they are criminals banning guns only punishes people who obey the law.
• 
  
  

  read more on harrisonprice.com
• 
  
  read more on harrisonprice.com
  Governments have no Rights, only Authorities, it is the people who have Rights who then give their permission to be ruled.  The Authority a government has may be taken away at any time by the people whereas the government may not take away any Rights from its citizens.
  The recent Supreme Court decision regarding firearms is most troubling.  In the Bill Of Rights, Amendment II it states:
  A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
• 
  
  read more on harrisonprice.com
  The purpose of the Second Amendment is clear… the people must be able to keep themselves free from their Government (or invading powers) and, should armed insurrection be necessary, we are able to use firearms to accomplish this goal.
  Democrats seem rather unconcerned that the Right to Bear Arms is a fundamental right alongside freedom of speech and the press, religious freedom, unreasonable searches and seizures, as well as the right to a trial by jury.
• 
  
  read more on harrisonprice.com
  Liberal writer David Ignatius writes:
  My biggest worry with Monday's Supreme Court decision is that by ruling, in effect, that every American can apply for a gun license, the justices will make gun ownership much more pervasive in a society that already has too many guns.
• 
  
  read more on harrisonprice.com
  Liberals in Chicago were not pleased with the razor thin ruling against their "gun grabber" laws:
• 
  
  read more on harrisonprice.com
  Washington's murder rate has plummeted — falling by 25 percent in 2009 alone. This compares with a national drop of only 7 percent last year. And D.C.'s drop has continued this year.
• 
  
  read more on harrisonprice.com
  This falling crime rate is happening when the economy is also worsening… in fact nationwide gun sales are up and crime is down.  Could it be that if a criminal thinks their next victim might be armed they think twice before committing a crime???
  The Supreme Court narrowly re-affirmed what all true Americans already knew… that firearm ownership is a fundamental right guaranteed by our Bill of Rights.
• 
  
  read more on harrisonprice.com
  Be sure to click the links to see the rest of this article.
  If your against gun ownership in America, I would suggest moving to another Country and see how they are forced to live without being able to protect themselves and their families.
  If you don't like the Constitution AS IS. Then all you need to do is leave.
  I'm mean really. Just leave Most of us actually care about our freedom here in the U.S.A.
  

Share 

0comments       

See and download the full gallery on posterous

Posted via email from Todays World

Related articles by Zemanta

• Supreme Court extends rights of gun ownership (greenreview.blogspot.com)
• District Attorney in Wisconsin will not prosecute certain state gun laws after Supreme Court decision (hotair.com)
• Letters: The Overturning of a City's Handgun Ban (nytimes.com)
• CME Trader, Firearms Sellers Sue Chicago Over Gun Law (businessweek.com)
• Chicago City Council passes new gun ordinance on handgun possession proposed by Mayor Daley (dailycaller.com)
• Bulletproof gun lobby strikes again | Sahil Kapur (guardian.co.uk)
• "District Attorney in Wisconsin will not prosecute certain state gun laws after Supreme Court decision" and related posts (hotair.com)
• Letters: The Supreme Court Ruling on Guns (nytimes.com)

REALITY REPORT #51 - Flushing the G20

REALITY REPORT #51 - Flushing the G20

4 minutes ago from todaysworld

• 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  read more on realityreport.blip.tv
• 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  read more on realityreport.blip.tv
   
  http://RealityReport.TV
  
  http://RestoreTheRepublic.com
  |
  In this edition, Gary blows off some steam taking a look at Obama's agenda at the Toronto G20 Conference as protesters burn police cars. He also sits down with Kurt Wallace to discuss the NullifyNow.com national tour. Michael Boldin, founder of the Tenth Amendment Center also joins Gary on this edition to talk about states rights. Nina delivers the details on the recent Supreme Court decision, Janet Napolitano's remarks about un-securing the border, and the Obama's Internet kill Switch. As always we'll take a dip into the Mailbag, and brand a new Enemy of the State.
  Kurt Wallace: Nullify Now Tour Kickoff:
  Michael Boldin: Nullify Now Tour Kickoff:
  
  http://blip.tv/file/3818191
  
  Michael Boldin: Constitutional Supreme Court Ruling:
• 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  read more on realityreport.blip.tv
• 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  read more on www.tangle.com
  http://www.tangle.com/view_video?viewkey=f156d1837c99f10517ce
  
  

Share 

0comments       

See and download the full gallery on posterous

Posted via email from Todays World

Related articles by Zemanta

• Your Ticket to Freedom (lewrockwell.com)
• Freedom in One Word (lewrockwell.com)
• We Refuse! (lewrockwell.com)
• Bail hearing resumes for T.O. man facing G20 charges (ctv.ca)
• Four alleged anarchists appear in G20 court (thestar.com)
• Calgary police contingent returns from G8/G20 summits (calgaryherald.com)
• Excellent G20 coverage from Torontoist (boingboing.net)
• Calgary police officers unhurt by summit protests (calgaryherald.com)
• States line up to challenge health care overhaul (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• G20 Protesters Turns Violente, Police Cars On Fire, 150 Arrested (econotwist.wordpress.com)

KUHNER: Obama the destroyer

clipped from www.washingtontimes.com President Obama is subverting the Supreme Court. His latest pick for the high court, Solicitor General Elena Kagan, is a radical leftist who would rubber-stamp Mr. Obama's transformative socialist agenda. She is not an independent, serious nominee, but an Obama ideological clone. The Supreme Court is the nation's highest legal body. It represents the apex of a separate branch of government designed to serve as a pivotal check and balance against the executive and legislative branches. A functioning democracy based on the rule of law depends upon an independent judiciary - especially, a Supreme Court immune from the corrosive grasp of political power. This is why dictators and socialist autocrats often seek to control their nations' supreme courts: By imposing their will on the high court they can bend the nation's judiciary to submit to their rule Ms. Kagan is unfit to sit on the high court She is also a staunch supporter of European-style "hate speech" laws

Related articles by Zemanta

• So You Want To Be A Supreme Court Justice (outsidethebeltway.com)
• Feingold, Kohl Praise Kagan as High Court Nominee (usnews.com)
• Kagan Supreme Court Confirmation: Nominee Keeps Up Heavy Schedule Of Hill Visits (huffingtonpost.com)
• Supreme courts around the world: more women in the US supreme court (guardian.co.uk)
• Top Republican: Summer vote for Kagan 'doable' (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• ACLJ Calls on Senate Judiciary Committee to Closely Examine Elena Kagan's Judicial Philosophy as Nominee for Supreme Court (eon.businesswire.com)
• When It Comes To Supreme Court Nominees And Elena Kagan, Cornyn Can't Keep His Story Straight (thinkprogress.org)
• Kagan's "unique experience" for the Court (hotair.com)

Atheists Want Leadership in Christian Organizations

If a person is an Atheist, Why in heck would they want to be labeled as a Christian?
Though I know this answer. It should be brought up in the Courts though. If you don't believe it. Stay out of it. Simple fix to many problems.

clipped from americanvision.org The U.S. Supreme Court is confronted with atheists that want to have "equal opportunity" in Christian organizations. The apparent reason that atheists want to be a part of such religious establishments is so they can control them. Christians are countering the atheists and want the freedom to choose their own leaders on religious grounds. What will the Supreme Court decide? Atheists Going Religious on Mother Teresa S. Atlanta Tea Party–Pastor’s Breakfast and Christian Leadership Event–Gary DeMar Speaker Why All Atheists aren’t Monsters Why Atheists are Theocrats The Atheists are Coming! The Atheists are Coming!

Related articles by Zemanta

• John Thatamanil: Beyond the Theism/Atheism Divide: A Plea for Humility (huffingtonpost.com)
• Pray for an Atheist Facebook Initiative Stirs Religious Emotions Between Christians and Atheists (prweb.com)
• Atheists, religious groups lobby on U.S. day of prayer (bendbulletin.com)
• 6 reviews of Atheist (rateitall.com)
• What Do We Want? (msatheists.org)
• Top 5 ways to be an Angry Atheist (seantheblogonaut.com)

Free speech versus kids and violent video games

clipped from news.yahoo.com WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court will decide whether free speech rights are more important than helping parents keep violent material away from children. The justices agreed Monday to consider reinstating California's ban on the sale or rental of violent video games to minors, a law the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco threw out last year on grounds that it violated minors' constitutional rights. California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who signed the law in 2005, said he was pleased the high court would review the appeals court decision. He said, "We have a responsibility to our kids and our communities to protect against the effects of games that depict ultra-violent actions, just as we already do with movies." However, the judge who wrote the decision overturning the law said at the time that there was no research showing a connection between violent video games and psychological harm to young people.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Supreme Court Video Game Case: SCOTUS To Decide If California Can Regulate Games (huffingtonpost.com)
• Court to Decide If State Can Regulate Video Games (abcnews.go.com)
• Supreme Court to Review California's Violent Videogame Law (1up.com)
• Supreme Court to weigh in on restricting violent game sales (arstechnica.com)
• Court to decide if state can regulate video games (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• Violent video-game ban for kids to get hearing (sfgate.com)

Court splits sharply on campus Christian argument

clipped from www.foxnews.com WASHINGTON (AP) — Supreme Court justices on Monday seemed to split sharply on whether a law school can deny recognition to a Christian student group because it won't let gays join, a case that could determine whether college nondiscrimination policies trump the rights of private organizations to determine who can — and cannot — belong to their ranks. In arguments tinged with questions of religious, racial and sexual discrimination, the court heard from the Christian Legal Society, which wants recognition from the University of California's Hastings College of the Law as an official campus organization with school financing and benefits. Hastings, located in San Francisco, turned them down, saying no recognized campus groups may exclude people due to religious belief or sexual orientation. "CLS has all of its activities entirely open to everyone," lawyer Michael McConnell said. "What it objects to is being run by non-Christians."

Related articles by Zemanta

• Court To Hear Arguments On Campus Christian Group (huffingtonpost.com)
• Can a College Block a Religious Student Group If It Won't Let Gays Join? (queerty.com)
• Can a College Block a Religious Student Group If It Won't Let Gays Join? (pinkbananaworld.com)
• Court to hear arguments on campus Christian group (sfgate.com)
• Court to hear arguments on campus Christian group (seattletimes.nwsource.com)

Judge rules against religious expression

Image via Wikipedia

clipped from www.onenewsnow.com A judge in Montana has ruled against a high school valedictorian who wasn't allowed to speak at her graduation ceremony because she wanted to give God credit for her success. (See earlier article) Rennee Griffith is now in her second year of college. She graduated from Butte High School in 2008 as one of the valedictorians, but when she submitted a draft of her speech to school authorities, her First Amendment rights were violated. The attorney reports that Griffith wanted to mention Christ once and God once in her speech, something he believes was well within her rights. "She was not doing what was forbidden by the Supreme Court or the Constitution, which is proselytizing," he argues. thank the football coach or the track coach or their uncle or a particular teacher, and they were permitted to do that," explains Griffith's attorney, Bill O'Connor. "The only thing they would not permit, by their own admission, was...her to attribute any achievements to her belief in God."

Related articles by Zemanta

• Court turns down student over religious speech (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• Adam Goldstein: UCSD Media Funding Freeze Offends the First Amendment (huffingtonpost.com)
• Scalia is Originalist... Except When He's Not (mydd.com)
• the Antidemocratic Activists Legislating From the Bench Are Ours: (brothersjuddblog.com)
• Georgia Community Speaks Out for Religious Freedom (dakotavoice.com)
• Sit-Lie Upheld in Palo Alto: As long as we've got sit-lie... (sf.curbed.com)

clipped from online.wsj.com A Free Speech Landmark Freedom has had its best week in many years. On Tuesday, Massachusetts put a Senate check on a reckless Congress, and yesterday the Supreme Court issued a landmark decision supporting free political speech by overturning some of Congress's more intrusive limits on election spending. That was a shock and awe moment at the Court, as it also should have been to a Washington press corps that has too often been a cheerleader for campaign-spending limits. Mr. Stewart was telling a truth already familiar to campaign-finance lawyers and the speech police at the Federal Election Commission. Former FEC Commissioner Hans von Spakovsky recalled yesterday that in 2004 the agency investigated whether a book written by George Soros critical of George W. Bush violated campaign laws. Liberals as much as conservatives should worry about laws that allow such investigations.

Related articles by Zemanta

• A Free Speech Landmark (online.wsj.com)
• Free speech or corrupted democracy? (RexBlog.com)