Todays World News (@TodaysWorldNews) / Twitter

Showing posts with label Racial profiling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Racial profiling. Show all posts

Monday, May 24, 2010

Flashback 2009 Maricopa County Sheriffs Office: Mayor Gordon, You're ignorant! Shut up!

Downtown Phoenix, Arizona, county seat of the ...Image via Wikipedia

The video here was uploaded in 2009 But, it still shows the truth in why the law had to pass. They work hard and have to deal with this daily. For the Country to go around trying to claim it's a bad thing. They obviously never read the law. It just enforces what is already a Federal Law. It also shows the The Government isn't doing their own job ... See Morelike they should be.
For those that ridicule AZ for passing this, Shows the actual intelligence of those who are pretending to run this country.
Scary thought, but true.

I'm not sure why anyone wouldn't want this law passed, unless they have something to worry about themselves. Hmm? doesn't O have a birth issue here himself?
That explains a lot. lol


clipped from www.youtube.com
April 03, 2009

Mayor Gordon accuses the Maricopa County Police Department in Arizona for racial profiling. Mayor Gordon is standing with activist groups. The police department arrest people for criminal defenses, illegal immigration, etc. They are put on the line against the illegal immigrants that are coming in from Mexico, and they are the only line of defense when they come into the state. Honors for this video
Based on a one-year in-depth study, a researcher estimates there are about 240,000 illegal immigrant sex offenders in the United States who have had an average of four victims each.:
a study of 55,322 illegal aliens incarcerated in federal, state, and local facilities during 2003. It found the following: * The 55,322 illegal aliens studied represented a total of 459,614 arrests some eight arrests per illegal alien;
 blog it

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Pros and cons of a US issued national ID card

{{es|1=DNI Electronico}}Image via Wikipedia

There are many issues standing around the entire Biometric RFID Personal information ID Card. This article has many of the standard issues and I would suggest to read through them all. If you don't know about the Technology of RFID. I would suggest doing at least a quick google search on it. This is very serious and very real. If you are so caught up in just letting things happen and doing nothing about it. Be ready and be warned that you may not have your freedom if this actually passes. A National ID. With your very personal information on it is nothing to be messing around with. It is not secure in any way, shape or form, No matter what they say. If it can be hooked up to a computer of any kind, it can be hacked into and stolen.

 

There is much more to this article be sure to read the rest of them here.

http://www.helium.com/items/1824708-pros-and-cons-of-a-us-issued-national-id-...

 

Here are a few of the pros and cons of issuing national ID cards.

*Pros

>If each citizen in the US carried a standard ID card, when requested by law enforcement, it would be easier to identify legal status or flag anyone who might be associated with a potential terrorist plot.

>Airline boarding would be more efficient and officials screening passengers could quickly verify identities.

>Potential reduction of fraudulent financial activities. An ID card can accompany any purchase and requested by the seller.

>The government and military agencies already use CAC cards http://www.cac.mil/ which contain a computer chip and this technology makes it easier to verify, identify and give access. Citizens carrying a similar ID card would have an easier time making a positive identification of themselves.

>End racial profiling because all individuals could easily show their card.

>Biometrics would make it harder to fraudulently obtain cards. Cards could not be bought off the street with a photo superimposed.

*Cons

>Privacy issues are one of the largest concerns associated with national ID cards. It isn't so much the card itself that is an apprehension, but the technology that could potentially be embedded in the cards and the sensitive information it could contain Not to mention security breaches of information.

>Concerns over how the card could evolve to be used for other purposes aside from ID. Technology is moving quickly and convenience is one of the benefits, but can also be a drawback if commercial business and other organizations begin using the ID card the way they did the social security number.

>Fear the card will take the social security card concept a step further and de-humanize people making them walking containers of data.

>Apprehension of medical records and assistance being connected to chip-embedded ID cards.

>Civil rights, control, and surveillance concerns. This includes potential government permission to travel or work.

>Cost of implementing and issuing not only cards, but the creation and maintenance of the associated technologies. This includes the application process and replacing lost or stolen cards and maintaining databases and keeping the information current.

 

There is much more to this article be sure to read the rest of them here.

http://www.helium.com/items/1824708-pros-and-cons-of-a-us-issued-national-id-...

Posted via email from Todays World


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Friday, April 23, 2010

Obama: Ariz. immigration measure 'misguided'

clipped from www.google.com

PHOENIX — President Barack Obama called an Arizona immigration bill "misguided" Friday and said it could violate people's civil rights, intensifying pressure on the state's Republican governor to veto the nation's toughest legislation against illegal immigration.

Obama said he's instructed the Justice Department to examine the Arizona bill to see if it's legal, and said the federal government must enact immigration reform at the national level — or leave the door open to "irresponsibility by others."

She's under intense pressure from anti-illegal immigration groups and lawmakers in her own party to sign the bill, but has given no indication what she will do.

Civil rights activists have said the bill would lead to racial profiling and deter Hispanics from reporting crimes. Hundreds of Hispanics protested the legislation at the State Capitol complex on Thursday.

The bill would take effect 90 days after the current legislative session ends if it becomes law.

 blog it

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Featured Post

The Truth about the Palestinian and Israeli conflict