Obama Proposes New Global Warming Agency

Image by distar97 via Flickr

clipped from newsmax.com WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration on Monday proposed a new agency to study and report on the changing climate. Also known as global warming, climate change has drawn widespread concern in recent years as temperatures around the world rise, threatening to harm crops, spread disease, increase sea levels, change storm and drought patterns and cause polar melting. NOAA recently reported that the decade of 2000-2009 was the warmest on record worldwide; the previous warmest decade was the 1990s. Most atmospheric scientists believe that warming is largely due to human actions, adding gases to the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas. Researchers and leaders from around the world met last month in Denmark to discuss ways to reduce climate-warming emissions, and a follow-up session is planned for later this year in Mexico.

Related articles by Zemanta

• "Climategate": a manufactured controversy (leftfootforward.org)
• Utah State Rep: Climate Change Is Conpiracy To Control Populaton (alan.com)
• Climate Science integrity upheld ... again (timesunion.com)
• Virginia GOP Mocks Epic Snow Storm As '12 Inches Of Global Warming' (thinkprogress.org)
• New Federal Climate Change Agency Forming (usnews.com)

Scientists using selective temperature data, skeptics say

Image via Wikipedia

• Scientists using selective temperature data, skeptics say

  "Call it the mystery of the missing thermometers. Two months after “climategate” cast doubt on some of the science behind global warming, new questions are being raised about the reliability of a key temperature database, used by the United Nations and climate change scientists as proof of recent planetary warming. Two American researchers allege that U.S. government scientists have skewed global temperature trends by ignoring readings from thousands of local weather stations around the world, particularly those in colder altitudes and more northerly latitudes, such as Canada. In the 1970s, nearly 600 Canadian weather stations fed surface temperature readings into a global database assembled by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Today, NOAA only collects data from 35 stations across Canada. Worse, only one station -- at Eureka on Ellesmere Island -- is now used by NOAA as a temperature gauge for all Canadian territory above the Arctic Circle. The Canadian government, meanwhile, operates 1,400 surface weather stations across the country, and more than 100 above the Arctic Circle, according to Environment Canada. Yet as American researchers Joseph D’Aleo, a meteorologist, and E. Michael Smith, a computer programmer, point out in a study published on the website of the Science and Public Policy Institute, NOAA uses “just one thermometer [for measuring] everything north of latitude 65 degrees.” Both the authors, and the institute, are well-known in climate-change circles for their skepticism about the threat of global warming. Mr. D’Aleo and Mr. Smith say NOAA and another U.S. agency, the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) have not only reduced the total number of Canadian weather stations in the database, but have “cherry picked” the ones that remain by choosing sites in relatively warmer places, including more southerly locations, or sites closer to airports, cities or the sea -- which has a warming effect on winter weather. Over the past two decades, they say, “t

  tags: skeptics, Government, Warming, temps, Climategate

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Scientists using selective temperature data, skeptics say (nationalpost.com)
• Fewer temperature reports could mean warming underestimated: scientist (canada.com)
• Fewer hurricanes, but more monsters thanks to global warming -- study (trueslant.com)
• Global Warming? Climate Change? (coffeemuses.com)