Todays World News (@TodaysWorldNews) / Twitter

Showing posts with label Taliban. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Taliban. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Video: Hamid Karzai warns Nato not to act as occupier in Afghanistan

KABUL, Afghanistan- Afghan President Hamid Kar...Image via Wikipediahttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/afghanistan/8547384/Hamid-Karzai-warns-Nato-not-to-act-as-occupier-in-Afghanistan.html
Speaking after a spate of civilian casualties caused by Nato bombing runs, Mr Karzai said: "I want to warn Nato forces that the repeat of their air strikes on Afghan homes are not allowed any more and will not be accepted by the people of Afghanistan, there is no reason for this kind of attack."
On Sunday a Nato raid on a compound in Helmand's Nawzad district led to the deaths of at least nine people, most of them children.
Mr Karzai warned that Nato would find itself unwelcome in his country if it did not treat their relationship with respect.
“Our treatment with Nato is from the point of view of an ally, if it turns to the other, to the behaviour of an occupation, that of course the Afghan people know how to deal with that," he said.
The argument over Nato tactics comes at a time of increased tension in Afghanistan with the Taliban launching a spring offensive in early May.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, May 23, 2011

Naval base attack raises questions over safety of Pak nukes

Television screenshot of the first known Pakis...Image via Wikipediahttp://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Naval-base-attack-raises-questions-over-safety-of-Pak-nukes/articleshow/8544646.cms
NEW DELHI: The Taliban attack on Pakistan's Mehran naval base raises an oft-repeated question: can Pakistan save its nuclear weapons?

Pakistan's nukes evoke a curious reaction -- every leader, in India or US, stress their safety, yet everybody stays up at night wondering whether they are really safe. Pakistan's failure to save its prized maritime reconnaissance aircraft has only deepened the worry.

Rahul Roy Chaudhury of International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), London, sums up the fears. "The attack on Mehran, a well-guarded military installation, at a time when Pakistan is on its highest alert status following the Abbottabad raid, raises serious questions over the security of Pakistan's nuclear assets. Not merely weapon storage sites, whose locations may be secure, but more likely, nuclear plants and research facilities whose locations are well known. This could be exacerbated by the passing of 'insider' information on their security systems by employees angered and radicalized by the Abbottabad raid."

How can Pakistan's nukes fall into the wrong hands? Either Taliban/al-Qaida getting a hold of the weapons, jihadis accessing fissile material which could be used to make a "dirty bomb" or, extremist officials within the Pakistani military establishment itself accessing weapons or material.

Taliban/al-Qaida have flirted with the idea of a "dirty bomb" or capturing nuclear assets for some time now. But as strategic experts have said, it's not easy getting a nuclear weapon, leave alone use it. The supporting infrastructure needed is fairly large. George Perkovich of Carnegie wrote, "Pakistan's...nukes are its crown jewels. The army cares about them in ways that it does not about bin Laden's whereabouts or fighting the Haqqani network."

Besides, Pakistan's weapons are not holed up in traditional silos. The military keeps them secret, but they are generally believed to be in storage sites (most probably in Punjab) and not in a high state of alert. Pakistani experts say they are also mobile to keep their locations secret. Shireen Mazari, Pakistani strategic expert, dismissed Taliban takeover fears in a post-Osama briefing. "The nuclear programme has matured, is robust, self-sustaining and widely dispersed." It's well guarded, but after a breach at their naval airbase, the question being asked is, how well is well guarded?

A new danger comes from the sophistication of Pakistan's nuclear weapons capability. In April 2011, Pakistan showed it could build tactical nuclear weapons with NASR. These are low-yield short range plutonium-based weapons and they are mobile. Which can give Pakistan's nuclear capability the jihadi edge, because they can be transported and used easily. The temptation to use them as a terror weapon just got easier.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, May 16, 2011

House Dems protest plans for permanent war against terror World War 3?

Democrat Donkey HealthImage by Truthout.org via Flickrhttp://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/160419-democrats-protest-gops-plans-for-permanent-war-against-taliban-al-qaeda

House Dems protest GOP's plans for permanent war against terror

By Pete Kasperowicz - 05/11/11 07:45 AM ET
Nearly three dozen House Democrats are calling on Republicans to withdraw a section of the 2012 defense authorization bill that they say would effectively declare a state of permanent war against unnamed Taliban and al Qaeda operatives.
A Tuesday letter from House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) and 32 other Democrats argues that affirming continued war against terrorist forces goes too far, giving too much authority to the president without debate in Congress.

Their letter cites language in the authorization bill that incorporates the Detainee Security Act, which affirms continued armed conflict against terrorists overseas.
"By declaring a global war against nameless individuals, organizations and nations 'associated' with the Taliban and al Qaeda, as well as those playing a supporting role in their efforts, the Detainee Security Act would appear to grant the president near unfettered authority to initiate military action around the world without further congressional approval," Democrats wrote. "Such authority must not be ceded to the president without careful deliberation from Congress."
The specific language in the bill is found in section 1034 of H.R. 1540, which affirms that the U.S. is "engaged in an armed conflict with al Qaeda, the Taliban and associated forces." It also affirms that the president has the authority to detain "certain belligerents" until the armed conflict is over.
"Al Qaeda, the Taliban and associated forces still pose a grave threat to U.S. national security," the bill says. "The Authorization for Use of Military Force necessarily includes the authority to address the continuing and evolving threat posed by these groups."
Democrats wrote to House Armed Services Committee Chairman Buck McKeon (R-Calif.) and asked him to hold hearings on these proposals before including them in the NDAA, particularly given the recent killing of Osama bin Laden in Pakistan.
But Republicans are not expected to consider that request. Instead, McKeon is expected to hold a markup Wednesday morning to grant committee approval of the bill.

New Authorization of Worldwide War Without End?

http://www.aclu.org/new-authorization-worldwide-war-without-end
Congress may soon vote on a new declaration of worldwide war without end, and without clear enemies. A “sleeper provision” deep inside defense bills pending before Congress could become the single biggest hand-over of unchecked war authority from Congress to the executive branch in modern American history.
President Obama has not sought new war authority. In fact, his administration has made clear that it believes it already has all of the authority that it needs to fight terrorism.
But Congress is considering monumental new legislation that would grant the president – and all presidents after him – sweeping new power to make war almost anywhere and everywhere. Unlike previous grants of authority for the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, the proposed legislation would allow a president to use military force wherever terrorism suspects are present in the world, regardless of whether there has been any harm to U.S. citizens, or any attack on the United States, or any imminent threat of an attack. The legislation is broad enough to permit a president to use military force within the United States and against American citizens. The legislation contains no expiration date, and no criteria to determine when a president’s authority to use military force would end.

The United States Congress is set to vote on legislation that authorizes the official start of World War 3.

http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2011/05/15/congress-vote-declaration-world-war-3-endless-war-borders-clear-enemies-22785/

The legislation authorizes the President of the United States to take unilateral military action against all nations, organizations, and persons, both domestically and abroad, who are alleged to be currently or who have in the past supported or engaged in hostilities or who have provided aid in support of hostilities against the United States or any of its coalition allies.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, May 13, 2011

Taliban show resolve to fight on after bin Laden

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110513/ap_on_re_as/as_pakistan

AP/Mohammad Sajjad
A soldier of Pakistani para military force collects the belongings of his colleagues after a bombing in Shabqadar near Peshawar, Pakistan on Friday, M AP – A soldier of Pakistani para military force collects the belongings of his colleagues after a bombing …
ISLAMABAD – A double Taliban suicide attack Friday that killed 66 paramilitary police recruits represented the deadliest terrorist strike in Pakistan since the killing of Osama bin Laden. It sent a strong signal that militants mean to fight on and to try to avenge the al-Qaida leader.
The attack came as both the Pakistani and Afghan wings of the Taliban have been carrying out attacks to prove they remain a potent force and bolster their profiles in case peace talks prevail in Afghanistan.
U.S. and Afghan officials have said they hope the Afghan Taliban will use bin Laden's death as an opportunity to break their link with al-Qaida — an alliance the U.S. says must be severed if the insurgents want peace in Afghanistan. But Afghan officials and Pakistani experts say any severing of ties would not happen anytime soon, if at all.
"The Taliban want to prove that bin Laden's killing did not really affect them," said Rahimullah Yusafzai, a Taliban expert in the Pakistani city of Peshawar who has interviewed their reclusive leader, Mullah Mohammed Omar.
"I don't think anybody is talking peace at this stage," Yusafzai said. "Everybody is wanting to score something on the ground. I think the spring fighting, the summer fighting will continue and it will be worse than last year."
In claiming responsibility for Friday's attack in northwest Pakistan, which also wounded about 120 people, the Taliban said it was avenging the May 2 death of bin Laden. It cited anger at Pakistan's military for failing to stop the unilateral U.S. raid on bin Laden's hideaway.
"The Pakistani army has failed to protect its land," Ahsanullah Ahsan, a spokesman for the Pakistani Taliban, told The Associated Press in a phone call.
In their communications, militants often try to tap into popular sentiments in Pakistan, where anti-Americanism is often stronger than fears of Islamist militants. This is despite militant attacks over the last four years claiming the lives of hundreds, if not thousands, of civilians.
In Afghanistan, where bin Laden's death has coincided with the beginning of the spring fighting season, the Taliban have launched a series of attacks including a two-day battle in the insurgents' stronghold of Kandahar in the south.
"Violence has increased because this is part of the peace process," said Mohammad Masoom Stanekzai, a top adviser to Afghan President Hamid Karzai who is active in efforts to reconcile with the Taliban. "When you get to the point where everybody wants to position themselves to get the benefit of a dialogue and discussion, then you naturally expect there will be a lot of efforts to strengthen positions."
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, May 2, 2011

The true heroes today are the men and women of the United States military. Not Obama!

Hamid Mir interviewing Osama bin Laden for Dai...Image via Wikipedia I still would like to see the Proof. Why in the World would they give him a nice burial? Why does the News stay away from the important messages and the REAL NEWS? This is not a time Praise Obama. This is a time to rejoice and be proud of the United States Military. You Guys Rock!

Now I have heard so many mixed stories on this so far, God only knows what the motives are behind each one or these. I do know this much. If the World does not see the proof of the body. Who is going to believe it? On the other. This is Re-Energizing America, People from all walks of life. political parties and just plain We The People are coming together. This is a major Victory for America. Again, Not Obama.

Any terrorists, Al-Qaeda, Islamic Extremist's, or Whatever they try to call them today, would be an idiot in trying to plan any attacks against America. This only means Our Military is still strong and more now are ready to join in. You don't mess with America's Freedom. Now more than ever more people are willing to stand up and fight even harder against the Idiots out there murdering so many innocent people.

Again, To our Military out there Fighting. You guys totally Rock. The Men and Women out there in Uniform, you all make me proud to be and American.  

http://www.teapartynation.com/forum/topics/payback-america-sends-osama-to
It took almost ten years, but Osama is dead.  That is the good news.
 The bad news is Obama is going to do what most politicians do, especially the liberal politicians.  He is going to take credit for something that not only he had little to do with, but had we actually listened to him, the event never would have happened. 
 According to news reports, the intelligence about the Osama compound was first generated four years ago through a Gitmo detainee, who was subjected to enhanced interrogation techniques.

One of the greatest outrages is the fact that the Obama regime seems so concerned about “the body being handled in accordance with Islamic practice and tradition.”
 What!!!
 We get mixed messages from the Obama regime and politically correct media on Obama.  Oh, the Al-Qaeda terrorists are not “true Muslims.”  If Osama is not a “true Muslim,” then who the hell cares how we treat his body?  If he is not really a Muslim, then why do we care?  How does Al-Qaeda or the Taliban treat American casualties when they capture an American body?  They mutilate the bodies.  Why does Osama deserve special treatment?

What should have happened, which would not happen under the Obama regime and to be fair, the Bush administration was too politically correct to do this either, but Osama’s body should have not been immediately buried.  We should have told everyone that the body was wrapped in pig fat before burial.
 Why?
 It is not just the visceral insult.  It is sending a message.  Contrary to what the politically correct say, Osama does represent the mainstream of Islam.  By defiling the body, we say that you are not getting your 72 virgins.   This should be the policy we have with every Islamic terrorist we capture.  If you die, we are going to deny you paradise.  If we capture you, we are going to feed you nothing but pork until you talk.

The man who shot Bin Laden will probably never be publically identified.  Navy Seals do not do the job for money or publicity.  They do it for love of America. 
 The true heroes today are the men and women of the United States military.
 The greatest military in the world.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Afghan Police Unit Defects to Taliban - NYTimes.com

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/02/world/asia/02afghan.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss

KABUL, Afghanistan — For months, American and Afghan officials have been promoting a plan to persuade masses of rank-and-file Taliban fighters to change sides and join the government. The tactic, known as “reintegration,” is one of the big hopes for turning the tide in the war.
Naweed Haqjoo/European Pressphoto Agency
Musa Khan Akbarzada, provincial governor in Ghazni, said a search was under way for missing officers.
At War
Notes from Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq and other areas of conflict in the post-9/11 era. Go to the Blog »
But the Taliban, it appears, have reintegration plans of their own. On Monday morning, they claimed to have put them into effect.
In Khogeyani, a volatile area southwest of the capital, the entire police force on duty Monday morning appears to have defected to the Taliban side. A spokesman for the Taliban said the movement’s fighters made contact with the Khogeyani’s police force, cut a deal, and then sacked and burned the station. As many as 19 officers vanished, as did their guns, trucks, uniforms and food.
Even the local police chief, who missed the attack, said he suspected a defection en masse.
“This was not an attack, but a plot,” said Mohammed Yasin, the chief of the Khogeyani police force. “The Taliban and the police made a deal.”
A spokesman for the Taliban, Zabiullah Mujahid, said the Afghan officers decided to defect after “learning the facts about the Taliban.”
“We never force people to join us,” said Mr. Mujahid, whose name is fictitious. “The police joined us voluntarily and are happy to work with us, and to start the holy war shoulder to shoulder with their Taliban brothers.”
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

OUR SOLDIERS HAVE BOUNTIES ON THEIR HEADS.... $1,000 PER AMERICAN SOLDIER. $6,000 PER AMERICAN VEHICLE... PAY ATTENTION AMERICA. These are our sons, daughters, husbands, brothers, fathers.... - Constitutional Emergency

MARJAH, AFGHANISTAN - MARCH 7:  Locals listen ...Image by Getty Images via @daylifehttp://patriotsforamerica.ning.com/forum/topic/show?id=2734278%3ATopic%3A191260&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_topic
At least five Iranian companies stationed in Afghanistan are covertly funding Taliban militants, paying them salaries of $233 a month with a
$1,000 bonus for killing an American soldier, according to the Sunday
Times of London.
Blowing up a US military vehicle is worth $6,000, making insurgents better paid than any Afghan police officer or soldier.
"Iran will never stop funding us, because Americans are dangerous for them as well," said a Taliban treasurer, who travels from the
mountainous Wardak province to an Iranian construction company that
operates out of Kabul to pick up the cash.
MONEY MAN: The regime of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (right) is paying to attack GIs in Afghanistan.
AP
MONEY MAN: The regime of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (right) is paying to attack GIs in Afghanistan.
"The money we get is not dirty. It is for jihad," he said.
The treasurer said he has picked up almost $79,000 in the past six months.
Afghan intelligence and Taliban sources told the Times that the firms -- set up with foreign aid money within the past six months -- provide
cash for a network of district Taliban treasurers to pay battlefield
expenses and bonuses for killing the enemy and destroying their
vehicles.
The Iranian companies win contracts to supply materials and logistics to Afghans involved in reconstruction. The money often comes in the form of aid from foreign donors.
Profits are transferred through poorly regulated Afghan banks -- including Kabul Bank, which is partly owned by President Hamid Karzai's brother Mahmood
-- to Tehran and Dubai.
From there, the money returns to Afghanistan through the informal Islamic banking system known as hawala.
"This means the companies involved in funding the insurgency can cover their tracks easily. It makes it harder for us to trace the cash flow,"
a senior Afghan intelligence official said.
He said the Iranian companies had been formed with the intention of winning contracts funded by foreign aid so that donors' cash could be channeled
into the insurgency.
The Iranian embassy in Kabul refused to respond to the allegations.
Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/international/wanted_iran_bounty_on_us...
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, May 17, 2010

Farmers flee Marja months after NATO forces battled to expel insurgents

clipped from www.msnbc.msn.com
Image: U.S. Marine takes an Afghan civilian to the main Marine base for questioning in Karez-e-Sayyidi

LASHKAR GAH, Afghanistan - Farmers from the district of Marja, which since February has been the focus of the largest American-led military operation in Afghanistan, are fleeing the area, saying that the Taliban are terrorizing the population and that American troops cannot protect the civilians.

The departure of the farmers is one of the most telling indications that Taliban fighters have found a way to resume their insurgency, three months after thousands of troops invaded this Taliban stronghold in the opening foray of a campaign to take control of southern Afghanistan. Militants have been infiltrating back into the area and the prospect of months of more fighting is undermining public morale, residents and officials said.

“People are leaving; you see 10 to 20 families each day on the road who are leaving Marja due to insecurity,” said a farmer, Abdul Rahman, 52, who was traveling on his own. “It is now hard to live there in this situation.”

 blog it

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

TIMMERMAN: Iran's ties to al Qaeda

Coat of arms of the Islamic Republic of Iran. ...Image via Wikipedia


As evidence of Iran's ties to Sunni terrorist groups, including al Qaeda, becomes overwhelm -ing, U.S. policymakers and spokesmen for the intelligence community are responding in ways all too familiar to Washington: denial, ridicule and outright lies.


In that report, released quietly in unclassified format, the Pentagon ran through Iran's long-standing ties to a number of Sunni terrorist groups, including Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Then it dropped a bombshell: Iran is also providing weapons, training and other assistance to the radical Wahhabi Hezb-i Islami party led by Gulbuddin Hekmatiar and to the Taliban.


In plain English, that means that Ayatollah Khamenei has ordered the IRGC to provide weapons and training to the Taliban and to other Sunni Muslim groups despite the conventional wisdom that for years has paralyzed the U.S. intelligence community into believing such cooperation is impossible because of their sectarian differences.

 blog it

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Monday, May 3, 2010

Pakistan Taliban leader threatens US cities

clipped from news.yahoo.com
Pakistan Taliban leader threatens US cities

ISLAMABAD (AFP) –
Pakistani Taliban leader Hakimullah Mehsud has vowed to attack major US cities in two purported new videos released months after his reported killing in a US missile strike.


The videos emerged after an attempted car bombing in New York City, for which his faction claimed responsibility in a third video, and provided the most substantial evidence so far that he survived a US attempt on his life.


Mehsud threatened to retaliate against the United States for the killing of Islamist militant leaders, appearing in a nine-minute video allegedly made on April 4, after his supposed death in January.


The videos spotlight the Islamist militant threat in nuclear-armed Pakistan, which the United States has put on the front line of the war on Al-Qaeda and where Pakistani troops have waged multiple offensives against the Taliban.

"The time is very near when our fedayeen will attack the American states in the major cities,"
 blog it

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Sunday, March 28, 2010

Obama Rallies U.S. Troops in Afghanistan

clipped from www.youtube.com
Speaking to U.S. Troops at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan, President Barack Obama said the United States will be less secure if the Taliban retake control of Afghanistan. (March 28)

Obama Rallies U.S. Troops in Afghanistan

 blog it

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Featured Post

The Truth about the Palestinian and Israeli conflict