Todays World News (@TodaysWorldNews) / Twitter

Showing posts with label Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Show all posts

Monday, April 18, 2011

Texan calls for jail time for enforcing Obamacare

House votes by congressional district. Democra...Image via Wikipediahttp://www.antiobamablog.com/2010/12/texan-calls-for-jail-time-for-enforcing-obamacare
Texans take their rights seriously.
A bill that has been prefiled for the 2011 state legislative session creates penalties of up to $5,000 in fines and up to five years in jail for anyone guilty of the “felony” of attempting “to enforce an act, order, law, statute, rule or regulation” of Obamacare, the president’s plan that effectively nationalizes the health-care decision making process.
The plan by Texas Rep. Leo Berman, R-Tyler, effectively would nullify the federal health care legislation in his state.
At least, that is what the bill that “relates to federal health care legislation” says:
The federal Act:
(1) is invalid in this state;
(2) is not recognized by this state;
(3) is specifically rejected by this state; and
(4) is null and void and of no effect in this state.
It provides that “a person who is an official, agent, or employee of the United States or an employee of a corporation providing services to the United States commits an offense if the person enforces or attempts to enforce an act, order, law, statute, rule, or regulation of the United States in violation of this chapter.”
It explains that the “assumption of power by the federal government in enacting the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (H.R. 3590; Pub. L. No. 111-148) as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (H.R. 4872; Pub. L. No. 111-152) interferes with the right of the people of this state to regulate health care as they determine is appropriate, and makes a mockery of James Madison’s assurance in Federalist Paper Number 45 that the powers delegated to the federal government are ‘few and defined’ while those that remain in the state governments are ‘numerous and indefinite.’”
An analysis of the issue by Michael Maharrey of the Tenth Amendment Center explains that there already is a widespread dissatisfaction across the United States from the mandates of Obamacare.
“The passage of the health care act opened the eyes of many previously apathetic citizens, making them aware of the rapidly expanding scope and influence of the federal government and its intrusiveness into their everyday lives,” he explained.
http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/11/20/the-lone-star-states-opportunity/
Madison agreed, Writing in Federalist 46, he laid out the blueprint for constraining overreaching federal power.
“Should an unwarrantable measure of the federal government be unpopular in particular States, which would seldom fail to be the case, or even a warrantable measure be so, which may sometimes be the case, the means of opposition to it are powerful and at hand. The disquietude of the people; their repugnance and, perhaps refusal to cooperate with officers of the Union, the frowns of the executive magistracy of the State; the embarrassment created by legislative devices, which would often be added on such occasions, would oppose, in any State, very serious impediments; and were the sentiments of several adjoining States happen to be in Union, would present obstructions which the federal government would hardly be willing to encounter.”
Texas has taken the first step. Now the people of Texas need to rise up and insist on passage of the bill. Ultimately, the people’s voice will carry the day.
The question remains, will they speak?
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, December 16, 2010

YouTube - REALITY REPORT #74: Killing Obamacare

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUjoOaiFEoE&feature=player_embedded
http://RTR.org | http://RealityReport.TV

 
| In this edition of the Reality Report Gary Franchi reviews a landmark Supreme Court decision and reveals the silver bullet to kill Obamacare. Sheriff Richard Mack returns to the show to give his firsthand account of a courtroom in Fresno, California where the Constitution is prohibited. Speakers from the 2010 Boston Tea Party present their feedback on the historic event and Nina delivers the news. Her stories include the shocking results of twins who were vaccinated in India, the Swedish Military's prior knowledge of the recent terrorist bombing, Ron Paul's plans to end the Federal Reserve, and the details about the revelation that Obamacare is unconstitutional. The viewers share their thoughts on whether or not Wikileaks' Julian Assange is a hero or villain and an unlikely application makes its way into the hall of shame as this weeks "Enemy of the State."Sheriff Richard Mack: Boston Tea Party 2010http://blip.tv/file/4512176 Boston Tea Party 2010 Highlightshttp://blip.tv/file/4512374 SPECIAL HOLIDAY DVD SALE: Enemy of the State: Camp FEMA 2 Available now at http://CampFEMA.com/catalog.html Have you met your political equals yet? Find them now at http://RTR.org/signup
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Airport

Airport security machinesImage via WikipediaSee the link for the rest of the story.
http://townhall.com/columnists/ThomasSowell/2010/11/23/airport_security

No country has better airport security than Israel-- and no country needs it more, since Israel is the most hated target of Islamic extremist terrorists. Yet, somehow, Israeli airport security people don't have to strip passengers naked electronically or have strangers feeling their private parts.
Does anyone seriously believe that we have better airport security than Israel? Is our security record better than theirs?
"Security" may be the excuse being offered for the outrageous things being done to American air travelers, but the heavy-handed arrogance and contempt for ordinary people that is the hallmark of this administration in other areas is all too painfully apparent in these new and invasive airport procedures.
Can you remember a time when a Cabinet member in a free America boasted of having his "foot on the neck" of some business or when the President of the United States threatened on television to put his foot on another part of some citizens' anatomy?
Yet this and more has happened in the current administration, which is not yet two years old. One Cabinet member warned that there would be "zero tolerance" for "misinformation" when an insurance company said the obvious, that the mandates of ObamaCare would raise costs and therefore raise premiums. Zero tolerance for exercising the First Amendment right of free speech?
Enhanced by Zemanta

Featured Post

The Truth about the Palestinian and Israeli conflict